A Survey of Physicians’ Knowledge and Practices Towards Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment
1
Issued Date
2025-02-01
Resource Type
eISSN
23046767
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85218684467
Journal Title
Dentistry Journal
Volume
13
Issue
2
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Dentistry Journal Vol.13 No.2 (2025)
Suggested Citation
Ananwattananon C., Boonpratham S., Satravaha Y., Chaweewannakorn C., Peanchitlertkajorn S. A Survey of Physicians’ Knowledge and Practices Towards Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment. Dentistry Journal Vol.13 No.2 (2025). doi:10.3390/dj13020063 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/105514
Title
A Survey of Physicians’ Knowledge and Practices Towards Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Oral appliance therapy (OAT) is an effective treatment alternative for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Understanding physicians’ knowledge and practices regarding OAT is crucial for improving OSA treatment, particularly in Southeast Asia, where there is limited research on this topic. Objectives: This study sought to survey physicians’ knowledge and practices regarding OAT for OSA treatment. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among Thai physicians attending the annual Sleep Society of Thailand meeting. The questionnaire included questions on demographics (six items), educational background (four items), OAT knowledge (two items), indications (three items), effectiveness (seven items), referral practices (five items), treatment planning (eight items), and the importance of OAT education (one item). Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed using SPSS to assess differences in knowledge and referral practices across various demographics. Results: This study achieved a response rate of 51.7% (30/58), with the respondents averaging 37.8 ± 6.0 years in age and 13.7 ± 6.7 years in practice. Although over 66.7% of the respondents recognized OAT’s effectiveness and understood its indications, only 36.7% regularly prescribed OAT, and 57.7% referred patients to specific dentists. Knowledge and referral practices differed significantly based on years of practice and postgraduate training in sleep medicine. Physicians with 11–20 years of practice demonstrated higher pediatric OAT knowledge scores compared to those with less experience. Those with postgraduate training achieved higher adult OAT knowledge scores and had greater referral experience. Conclusions: Despite the general awareness and good knowledge of OAT among physicians, clinical use and referral rates remain low. To bridge the gap between knowledge and practice, it is recommended that postgraduate training in dental sleep medicine is promoted and further research is conducted to identify barriers to the adoption of OAT.