Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation for invasively ventilated critically ill patients—A focus group study

dc.contributor.authorStilma W.
dc.contributor.authorVerweij L.
dc.contributor.authorSpek B.
dc.contributor.authorScholte op Reimer W.J.M.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorPaulus F.
dc.contributor.authorRose L.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-22T11:18:14Z
dc.date.available2023-06-22T11:18:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation (MI-E) is used as an airway clearance intervention in primary care (home ventilation), long-term care (prolonged rehabilitation after intensive care, neuromuscular diseases, and spinal cord injury), and increasingly in acute care in intensive care units (ICU). Aim: We sought to develop in-depth understanding of factors influencing decision-making processes of health care professionals regarding initiation, escalation, de-escalation, and discontinuation of MI-E for invasively ventilated patients including perceived barriers and facilitators to use. Methods: We conducted focus groups (3 in the Netherlands; 1 with participants from four European countries) with clinicians representing the ICU interprofessional team and with variable experience of MI-E. The semi-structured interview guide was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Two researchers independently coded data for directed content analysis using codes developed from the TDF. Results: A purposive sample of 35 health care professionals participated. Experience varied from infrequent to several years of frequent MI-E use in different patient populations. We identified four main themes: (1) knowledge; (2) beliefs; (3) clinical decision-making; and (4) future adoption. Conclusion: Interprofessional knowledge and expertise of MI-E in invasively ventilated patients is limited due to minimal available evidence and adoption. Participants believed MI-E a potentially useful intervention for airway clearance and inclusion in weaning protocols when more evidence is available. Relevance to Clinical Practice: This focus group study provides an overview of current practice, knowledge and expertise, and barriers and facilitators to using MI-E in mechanically ventilated patients. From these data, it is evident there is a need to develop further clinical expertise and evidence of efficacy to further understand the role of MI-E as an airway clearance technique for ventilated patients.
dc.identifier.citationNursing in Critical Care (2022)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nicc.12858
dc.identifier.eissn14785153
dc.identifier.issn13621017
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85143242321
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/87569
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectNursing
dc.titleMechanical insufflation-exsufflation for invasively ventilated critically ill patients—A focus group study
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143242321&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleNursing in Critical Care
oairecerif.author.affiliationHogeschool van Amsterdam, University of Applied Sciences
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitatsSpital Zurich
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversität Zürich
oairecerif.author.affiliationKing's College London
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversiteit van Amsterdam
oairecerif.author.affiliationAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam

Files

Collections