Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation for invasively ventilated critically ill patients—A focus group study
dc.contributor.author | Stilma W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Verweij L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Spek B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Scholte op Reimer W.J.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Schultz M.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Paulus F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rose L. | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-22T11:18:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-22T11:18:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation (MI-E) is used as an airway clearance intervention in primary care (home ventilation), long-term care (prolonged rehabilitation after intensive care, neuromuscular diseases, and spinal cord injury), and increasingly in acute care in intensive care units (ICU). Aim: We sought to develop in-depth understanding of factors influencing decision-making processes of health care professionals regarding initiation, escalation, de-escalation, and discontinuation of MI-E for invasively ventilated patients including perceived barriers and facilitators to use. Methods: We conducted focus groups (3 in the Netherlands; 1 with participants from four European countries) with clinicians representing the ICU interprofessional team and with variable experience of MI-E. The semi-structured interview guide was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Two researchers independently coded data for directed content analysis using codes developed from the TDF. Results: A purposive sample of 35 health care professionals participated. Experience varied from infrequent to several years of frequent MI-E use in different patient populations. We identified four main themes: (1) knowledge; (2) beliefs; (3) clinical decision-making; and (4) future adoption. Conclusion: Interprofessional knowledge and expertise of MI-E in invasively ventilated patients is limited due to minimal available evidence and adoption. Participants believed MI-E a potentially useful intervention for airway clearance and inclusion in weaning protocols when more evidence is available. Relevance to Clinical Practice: This focus group study provides an overview of current practice, knowledge and expertise, and barriers and facilitators to using MI-E in mechanically ventilated patients. From these data, it is evident there is a need to develop further clinical expertise and evidence of efficacy to further understand the role of MI-E as an airway clearance technique for ventilated patients. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nursing in Critical Care (2022) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/nicc.12858 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 14785153 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 13621017 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85143242321 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/87569 | |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
dc.subject | Nursing | |
dc.title | Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation for invasively ventilated critically ill patients—A focus group study | |
dc.type | Article | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143242321&origin=inward | |
oaire.citation.title | Nursing in Critical Care | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Hogeschool van Amsterdam, University of Applied Sciences | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | UniversitatsSpital Zurich | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Mahidol University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Universität Zürich | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | King's College London | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Nuffield Department of Medicine | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Universiteit van Amsterdam | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam |