The effects of enhanced formaldehyde clearance in a gross anatomy laboratory by floor plan redesign and dissection table adjustment
Issued Date
2023-05-01
Resource Type
ISSN
09441344
eISSN
16147499
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85152904013
Journal Title
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Volume
30
Issue
23
Start Page
64246
End Page
64253
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Vol.30 No.23 (2023) , 64246-64253
Suggested Citation
Durongphan A., Rungruang J., Nitimanee E., Panichareon B. The effects of enhanced formaldehyde clearance in a gross anatomy laboratory by floor plan redesign and dissection table adjustment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research Vol.30 No.23 (2023) , 64246-64253. 64253. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-26906-5 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/81555
Title
The effects of enhanced formaldehyde clearance in a gross anatomy laboratory by floor plan redesign and dissection table adjustment
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Formaldehyde has carcinogenic properties. It is associated with nasopharyngeal cancer and causes irritation of the eyes, nose, throat, and respiratory system. Formaldehyde exposure is a significant health concern for those participating in the gross anatomy laboratory, but no learning method can substitute cadaver dissection. We performed a formaldehyde level study in 2018, which found that most of the breathing zone (S-level) and environment (R-level) formaldehyde levels during laboratory sessions at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital exceeded international ceiling standards. In the academic year 2019, we adapted the engineering rationale of the NIOSH hierarchy of controls to facilitate formaldehyde clearance by opening the dissection table covers and increasing the area per dissection table, then measured formaldehyde ceiling levels by formaldehyde detector tube with a gas-piston hand pump during (1) body wall, (2) upper limb, (3) head-neck, (4) thorax, (5) spinal cord removal, (6) lower limb, (7) abdomen, and (8) organs of special senses dissection sessions and comparing the results with the 2018 study. The perineum region data were excluded from analyses due to the laboratory closure in 2019 from the COVID-19 outbreak. There were statistically significant differences between the 2018 and 2019 S-levels (p < 0.001) and R-levels (p < 0.001). The mean S-level decreased by 64.18% from 1.34 ± 0.71 to 0.48 ± 0.26 ppm, and the mean R-level decreased by 70.18% from 0.57 ± 0.27 to 0.17 ± 0.09 ppm. The highest formaldehyde level in 2019 was the S-level in the body wall region (1.04 ± 0.3 ppm), followed by the S-level in the abdomen region (0.56 ± 0.08 ppm) and the spinal cord removal region (0.51 ± 0.29 ppm). All 2019 formaldehyde levels passed the OSHA 15-min STEL standard (2 ppm). The R-level in the special sense region (0.06 ± 0.02 ppm) passed the NIOSH 15-min ceiling limit (0.1 ppm). Three levels for 2019 were very close: the R-level in the head-neck region (0.11 ± 0.08 ppm), the abdomen region (0.11 ± 0.08), the body wall region (0.14 ± 0.12 ppm), and the S-level in the special sense region (0.12 ± 0.04 ppm). In summary, extensive analysis and removal of factors impeding formaldehyde clearance can improve the general ventilation system and achieve the OSHA 15-min STEL standard.