German population norms of the preference to solitude scale and its correlates

dc.contributor.authorHajek A.
dc.contributor.authorSutin A.R.
dc.contributor.authorLuchetti M.
dc.contributor.authorStephan Y.
dc.contributor.authorPeltzer K.
dc.contributor.authorTerracciano A.
dc.contributor.authorKönig H.H.
dc.contributor.correspondenceHajek A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-31T18:11:34Z
dc.date.available2024-05-31T18:11:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-01
dc.description.abstractAim Our first aim was to present norm values for the Preference for Solitude Scale by sex, age, and other sociodemographic groups. Our second aim was to evaluate the correlates of preference for solitude. Methods Data were collected in August/September 2023 from a sample of individuals (N = 5000) living in Germany aged 18 to 74 years (ensuring representativeness in terms of sex, age group and federal state for the German general adult population). The established and valid Preference for Solitude Scale (range 0 to 12, with higher values reflecting a stronger preference for solitude) was used to quantify the preference for solitude. Norm values were provided by sex and age groups. Multiple linear regressions were used to examine the correlates of preference for solitude. Results Average preference for solitude score was 7.6 (SD = 3.0; 0 to 12). The average score was 7.3 (SD = 3.0) among males and 7.9 (SD = 2.9) among females. Regressions showed that a stronger preference for solitude was associated with being female (β = .51, p < .001), being older (e.g., being 40 to 49 years compared to 18 to 29 years, β = .85, p < .001), being single (e.g., divorced compared to being single, β = -.78, p < .01), higher level of education (secondary education compared to primary education, β = .43, p < .01), never been a smoker (e.g., daily smoker compared to never smokers, β = -.61, p < .001), absence of alcohol consumption (e.g., drinking once a week compared to never drinking, β = -1.09, p < .001), no sports activity (e.g., 2–4 hours per week compared to no sports activity, β = -.60, p < .001), poorer self-rated health (β = .28, p < .001) and more depressive symptoms (β = .05, p < .001). Sex-stratified regressions yielded similar results. Conclusion Norm values provided in this study can be used as a benchmark for comparison with other countries and can guide further research dealing with preferences for solitude. We demonstrated the importance of several sociodemographic factors (e.g., marital status), lifestyle-related factors (e.g., sports activity), and health-related factors (e.g., depressive symptoms) for the preference for solitude. Such knowledge about the correlates of preference for solitude may help to characterize them. This is essential to ensure a good balance between social interaction and being alone. This is important because preference for solitude is associated with poor self-rated health and depression, but also with healthy behaviors such as abstaining from smoking and drinking
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE Vol.19 No.5 (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0303853
dc.identifier.eissn19326203
dc.identifier.pmid38771848
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194014713
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/98553
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary
dc.titleGerman population norms of the preference to solitude scale and its correlates
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85194014713&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.titlePLoS ONE
oaire.citation.volume19
oairecerif.author.affiliationCollege of Medical and Health Science
oairecerif.author.affiliationCentre Européen de Recherche sur le Mouvement Humain
oairecerif.author.affiliationFlorida State University College of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of the Free State
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Files

Collections