EFFECTIVENESS OF MOTOR IMAGERY COMBINED WITH STRUCTURED PROGRESSIVE CIRCUIT CLASS TRAINING ON FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY IN POST-STROKE INDIVIDUALS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Issued Date
2022-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
16501977
eISSN
16512081
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85135380443
Pubmed ID
35797065
Journal Title
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume
54
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Vol.54 (2022)
Suggested Citation
Aung N. EFFECTIVENESS OF MOTOR IMAGERY COMBINED WITH STRUCTURED PROGRESSIVE CIRCUIT CLASS TRAINING ON FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY IN POST-STROKE INDIVIDUALS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Vol.54 (2022). doi:10.2340/jrm.v54.1390 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/86313
Title
EFFECTIVENESS OF MOTOR IMAGERY COMBINED WITH STRUCTURED PROGRESSIVE CIRCUIT CLASS TRAINING ON FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY IN POST-STROKE INDIVIDUALS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effect of motor imagery combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy vs health education combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy on dynamic balance, endurance, and functional mobility in poststroke individuals. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: A total of 40 post-stroke individuals were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group was trained using motor imagery combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy, while the control group received health education combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy, 3 times a week for 4 weeks with an overall of 12 sessions. Outcomes included the step test for affected and unaffected limbs, the 6-Minute Walk Test, and the Timed Up and Go test. Assessments were performed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after the intervention Results: There were significant effects (p<0.05) of: group on the step test for unaffected limb; of time on all outcomes; and of their interaction effect on the step test for affected limb, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Timed Up and Go test. Inter-group comparison showed significant differences (p<0.05) in the step test for unaffected limb at 2 weeks after the intervention. At 4 weeks after the intervention, significant differences (p<0.05) were found in the step test for affected and unaffected limbs and in the Timed Up and Go test. Conclusion: Motor imagery combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy was more effective on the step test, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Timed Up and Go test than training with structured progressive circuit class therapy alone. This suggest that that motor imagery should be incorporated into training programmes for restoring dynamic balance, endurance, and functional mobility in poststroke individuals.