Imlifidase therapy: exploring its clinical uses
dc.contributor.author | Rostaing L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Noble J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Malvezzi P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jouve T. | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-19T07:20:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-19T07:20:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Imlifidase, the IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, can cleave all four human IgG subclasses with precise specificity. All IgG molecules can be inactivated for ~1-to-2 weeks, until new IgG synthesis is detected. Areas covered: Imlifidase was first studied for the desensitization of highly HLA-sensitized patients to enable kidney transplantation. It is currently being evaluated for kidney transplant recipients who have antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), those with acute kidney injury in the setting of anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, and those with Guillain–Barré syndrome. In 2020, imlifidase received conditional approval from the European Medicines Agency for use to desensitize deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients with a positive crossmatch. Literature search through PubMed revealed that so far, 39 crossmatched-positive patients, i.e. in the presence of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) on the transplantation day, have received imlifidase prior to kidney transplantation in four single-arm, open-label, phase II studies. Results at 3-year follow-up are good, i.e. allograft survival is 84%, despite 38% of patients presenting with acute AMR. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 years was 55 mL/min/1.73 m2. Expert opinion: The major hurdle now is how to prevent/avoid DSA rebound within days 5–15 post-transplantation. Thus, imlifidase represents a major breakthrough for highly HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates, particularly those that have calculated panel-reactive alloantibodies of ≥90%. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Vol.24 No.2 (2023) , 259-265 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14656566.2022.2150965 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 17447666 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 14656566 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36404277 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85142667050 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/81524 | |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
dc.subject | Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | |
dc.title | Imlifidase therapy: exploring its clinical uses | |
dc.type | Review | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85142667050&origin=inward | |
oaire.citation.endPage | 265 | |
oaire.citation.issue | 2 | |
oaire.citation.startPage | 259 | |
oaire.citation.title | Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy | |
oaire.citation.volume | 24 | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Ramathibodi Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Université Grenoble Alpes | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble |