Green innovation, ESG governance, and digital transformation: Evidence from China's high-end manufacturing sector

dc.contributor.authorYi J.
dc.contributor.authorShiji L.
dc.contributor.authorRen M.
dc.contributor.authorYang X.
dc.contributor.authorDhar B.K.
dc.contributor.correspondenceYi J.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-07T18:07:16Z
dc.date.available2025-12-07T18:07:16Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-30
dc.description.abstractResearch background:Green technological innovation (GTI) is widely regarded as a pathway to reducing corporate carbon emissions; however, its effectiveness remains contested because of rebound effects, governance gaps, and complexities in the digital era. Although existing studies highlight the role of innovation, few investigate how ESG governance and digital transformation (DT) jointly influence firm-level carbon outcomes, particularly in emerging economies. Purpose of the article: This study investigates how GTI, ESG performance, and DT interact to influence firm-level carbon emission intensity in China’s high-end equipment manufacturing sector. The study examines the mediating and moderating mechanisms that determine whether innovation generates sustainable environmental outcomes. Methods: Drawing on Endogenous Growth Theory, Stakeholder Theory, and Dynamic Capabilities Theory, the paper develops an integrated conceptual framework. Drawing on an unbalanced panel dataset of 4,213 firm-year observations (2010–2020) from A-share listed highend manufacturers, the study employs fixed-effects regression models to capture nonlinear innovation effects, mediation analysis to test ESG performance, and moderation analysis to assess the amplifying or constraining role of DT. Findings & value added: The results reveal a U-shaped relationship between GTI (quality and quantity) and carbon emissions: while innovation reduces emissions at lower levels, it may generate rebound effects when excessive or misaligned. ESG performance mediates this relationship, particularly in state-owned enterprises, while DT moderates it as a double-edged capability—enhancing both the benefits and risks of innovation. The study advances strategic environmental management by reconceptualizing ESG and DT as core enablers of innovation, refining growth and innovation theories through the identification of nonlinear dynamics, and offering firm-level insights for carbon-intensive sectors in emerging and advanced economies alike.
dc.identifier.citationOeconomia Copernicana Vol.16 No.3 (2025) , 977-1020
dc.identifier.doi10.24136/oc.3755
dc.identifier.eissn23531827
dc.identifier.issn20831277
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105023392912
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/113418
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectBusiness, Management and Accounting
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectArts and Humanities
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
dc.titleGreen innovation, ESG governance, and digital transformation: Evidence from China's high-end manufacturing sector
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105023392912&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage1020
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage977
oaire.citation.titleOeconomia Copernicana
oaire.citation.volume16
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationHarbin University of Commerce
oairecerif.author.affiliationZhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages

Files

Collections