The Impact of Self-Management Interventions on Behavioral and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence From 2003-2024

dc.contributor.authorHanrop S.
dc.contributor.authorNarupan N.
dc.contributor.authorPraha N.
dc.contributor.authorPhianhasin L.
dc.contributor.authorRuksakulpiwat S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceHanrop S.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-29T18:14:09Z
dc.date.available2025-06-29T18:14:09Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate and synthesize evidence on the impact of self-management interventions in improving behavioral and clinical outcomes among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across eight electronic databases—CINAHL Plus with Full Text, ProQuest, PubMed, Medline with Full Text, SAGE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science—to identify studies published from inception to 2024. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies assessing self-management interventions in individuals with SLE were included. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data synthesis followed a convergent integrated analysis framework to identify recurring themes and subthemes. Results: A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 10 randomized controlled trials (66.67%) and 5 quasiexperimental studies (33.33%). The interventions targeted physical, mental, and behavioral health through various strategies. The most common interventions included counseling and education (7 studies, 22.58%), followed by physical activity programs (2 studies, 6.45%), and self-management sessions (2 studies, 6.45%). Other interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, strengthening exercises, and digital health tools, were also implemented. In-person interventions (46.67%) were the most common delivery format, followed by digital platforms (26.67%). Self-management interventions led to significant improvements in physical health (eg, reduced fatigue and improved functional capacity), mental health (eg, reduced anxiety and depression), and health behaviors (eg, enhanced adherence to treatment and self-care practices). Furthermore, the interventions contributed to an improved quality of life by addressing the physical, psychological, and social challenges faced by individuals with SLE. Conclusion: Self-management interventions positively impact behavioral and clinical outcomes in individuals with SLE. Future research should explore long-term sustainability, integration of digital health strategies, and personalized approaches. Expanding access to self-management programs, particularly in low-resource settings, may further enhance outcomes for individuals with SLE.
dc.identifier.citationPatient Preference and Adherence Vol.19 (2025) , 1763-1779
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/PPA.S521546
dc.identifier.eissn1177889X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105008820901
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/110952
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.titleThe Impact of Self-Management Interventions on Behavioral and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence From 2003-2024
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105008820901&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage1779
oaire.citation.startPage1763
oaire.citation.titlePatient Preference and Adherence
oaire.citation.volume19
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Washington
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University

Files

Collections