Underdiagnosis of silicosis revealed by reinterpretation of chest radiographs in Thai ceramic workers
Issued Date
2023-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
1828695X
eISSN
20496958
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85165468952
Journal Title
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
Volume
18
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Vol.18 (2023)
Suggested Citation
Chansaengpetch S., Dumavibhat N., Kaewlai R., Jaroonpipatkul A., Virojskulchai T., Bunman S., Khantharot K., Pholngam A., Thanakunchai T. Underdiagnosis of silicosis revealed by reinterpretation of chest radiographs in Thai ceramic workers. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Vol.18 (2023). doi:10.4081/mrm.2023.910 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/88155
Title
Underdiagnosis of silicosis revealed by reinterpretation of chest radiographs in Thai ceramic workers
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: In Thailand, epidemiological data on silicosis in the ceramic sector is lacking and the underdiagnosis of silicosis remains an extensive concern. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of silicosis and the extent of underdiagnosis among Thai ceramic workers by reinterpreting chest radiographs previously taken by a health check-up unit. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on ceramic workers undergoing health surveillance using chest radiographs in one ceramic factory in September 2018. All chest radiographs were done retrospectively, then were reinterpreted by professional readers specially trained in using the ILO International Classification of Radiograph of Pneumoconioses (ILO/ICRP). Chest radiographs with a profusion of 1/1 or greater were suggestive of silicosis. Results: Out of the 244 participants undergoing chest radiography, the prevalence of silicosis was 2.9%. Overall, the mean age of the participants was 41 years, and 72.1% were female. Among individuals with silicosis, the median age was 43 years; 71.4% were male; the average employment duration was 26.9 years; while the male sex was the significant variable associated with silicosis with an odds ratio of 7.01 (95% confidence interval 1.31 to 37.4). Regarding the underdiagnosis, the health check-up unit failed to recognize all individuals with silicosis, and could not detect any radiographic chest abnormalities in 57.1% of those with silicosis. Conclusions: Despite the low prevalence of silicosis among Thai ceramic workers, this finding indicates ongoing exposure to silica in the ceramic industry. In addition, a significant proportion of the silicosis cases were underrecognized. Future efforts to prevent underdiagnosis and improve an occupational health surveillance service in Thailand are needed.
