Relationship of the Degree of Nerve Exposure and Surgical Manipulation and Short-Term Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Prospective Study
Issued Date
2024-02-01
Resource Type
ISSN
02782391
eISSN
15315053
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85181693208
Pubmed ID
37989495
Journal Title
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume
82
Issue
2
Start Page
159
End Page
168
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Vol.82 No.2 (2024) , 159-168
Suggested Citation
Thongngam T., Srimaneekarn N., Sirintawat N., Kasemsarn W. Relationship of the Degree of Nerve Exposure and Surgical Manipulation and Short-Term Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Prospective Study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Vol.82 No.2 (2024) , 159-168. 168. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2023.10.007 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/95620
Title
Relationship of the Degree of Nerve Exposure and Surgical Manipulation and Short-Term Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Prospective Study
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Neurosensory disturbance (NSD) is a common complication after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) due to inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. The impact of intraoperative nerve manipulation on NSD remains debated. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IAN exposure and manipulation during SSRO on functional sensory recovery (FSR). Study Design: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of 40 patients undergoing SSRO at Mahidol University from December 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 20-34, ASA Class I-II. The exclusion criteria were patients with systemic bone disease, history of head and neck or neurological pathology, previous SSRO, or incomplete data collection. Predictor Variable: Degree of intraoperative nerve manipulation was divided by the attending surgeon as follows; 1) Nerve fully encased in distal segment and not visible (NS); 2) Nerve encased in distal segment but partially visible (DS); and 3) Nerve partially encased in proximal segment and fully dissected free (PS). Outcome Variables: The area of interest was divided into the lip and chin. The primary outcome was time to FSR. The secondary outcome was subjective patient report, using a visual analogue scale, compared to FSR. Covariates: The covariates were sex, age, skeletal diagnosis, degree of movement, and concomitant genioplasty/subapical procedure. Analyses: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Mcnemar test were utilized. P-value <.05 was significant. Results: In the lip, the median times to FSR were NS, 2 days; DS, 45 days; PS, 102 days. (Interquartile range: 77,127, 114, respectively) In the chin, the median times to FSR were NS, 23 days; DS, 92 days; PS, 87 days. (Interquartile range: 77, 161, 101, respectively.) Nerve manipulation significantly affected FSR in the lip and chin (P =.001, <0.001, respectively. Cox hazard ratios for DS and PS were lower compared to NS. Patients consistently reported more NSD compared to FSR as per Mcnemar test. Conclusion and Relevance: After SSRO, FSR in the lip is prolonged when the IAN is partially encased in the proximal segment and released. This raises the question of the efficacy of surgically releasing a partially encased IAN.