Cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for non-displaced osteoporotic femoral neck fractures in older adults in Ontario, Canada

dc.contributor.authorRuangsomboon P.
dc.contributor.authorHuang Y.Q.
dc.contributor.authorRuangsomboon O.
dc.contributor.authorTam D.
dc.contributor.authorZywiel M.
dc.contributor.authorRavi B.
dc.contributor.authorNaimark D.M.J.
dc.contributor.correspondenceRuangsomboon P.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-11T18:19:45Z
dc.date.available2026-05-11T18:19:45Z
dc.date.issued2026-05-01
dc.description.abstractAims: This economic evaluation study assessed the cost-effectiveness of six treatment strategies for non-displaced osteoporotic femoral neck fractures (NDFNFs) in older adults using a Markov cohort model from the Ontario, Canada, public payer perspective. Methods: A probabilistic Markov chain Monte Carlo decision analysis model was developed to compare six strategies: 1) cemented femoral fixation total hip arthroplasty (THA; hybrid, cemented femoral component/uncemented cup - 'cemented THA'); 2) cementless THA; 3) cemented hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA); 4) cementless HHA; 5) internal fixation (IF); and 6) conservative treatment. The base case cohort consisted of Canadian patients presenting with a NDFNF aged 65 years, modelled with a lifetime horizon. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life-months (QALMs), lifetime costs (discounted at 1.5% annually), net monetary benefits (NMBs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). All costs are presented in Canadian dollars (CAD, $). The cost-effectiveness threshold (λ) was $4,166.67 per QALM. The primary outcome measure was expected NMBs, and the preferred strategy was the one with the highest expected NMBs over the lifetime horizon. Results: The estimated mean costs were $6,054 (IF), $11,995 (cemented THA), $11,011 (cemented HHA), $11,854 (cementless HHA), $15,405 (cementless THA), and $7,617 (conservative treatment). Cemented THA yielded the highest QALMs (192.7). Cemented THA had the highest NMB ($790,784). Cementless THA, cementless HHA, and conservative treatment were absolutely dominated while cemented HHA was extendedly dominated. After excluding dominated strategies, the ICER for cemented THA compared with IF was $127.5 per QALM, indicating that cemented THA is cost-effective relative to IF. At a λ of $4,166.67 per QALM, cemented THA was the most cost-effective strategy in 48.7% of simulations, followed by cemented HHA (31.2%) and IF (17.9%). Conclusion: Cemented femoral fixation THA is the most preferred strategy (highest expected NMB at λ) for NDFNFs in 65-year-old patients. When evaluated against a λ of $4,166.67 per QALM, cemented THA outperforms cementless THA, HHA, IF, and conservative treatment.
dc.identifier.citationBone Joint Journal Vol.108-B No.5 (2026) , 688-697
dc.identifier.doi10.1302/0301-620X.108B5.BJJ-2025-0673.R1
dc.identifier.eissn20494408
dc.identifier.pmid42061878
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105037708356
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/116677
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for non-displaced osteoporotic femoral neck fractures in older adults in Ontario, Canada
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105037708356&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage697
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPage688
oaire.citation.titleBone Joint Journal
oaire.citation.volume108-B
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Toronto
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Manitoba
oairecerif.author.affiliationSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
oairecerif.author.affiliationLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences

Files

Collections