Radiological Study of Atlas Arch Defects with Meta-Analysis and a Proposed New Classification
dc.contributor.author | Suphamungmee W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yurasakpong L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Poonudom K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tubbs R.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Iwanaga J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kruepunga N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Chaiyamoon A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Suwannakhan A. | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-22T18:02:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-22T18:02:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study consists of a retrospective cohort study, a systematic review, and a meta-analysis which were separately conducted. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of atlas arch defects, generate an evidence-based synthesis, and propose a common classification system for the anterior and combined atlas arch defects. Atlas arch defects are well-corticated gaps in the anterior or posterior arch of the atlas. When both arches are involved, it is known as a combined arch defect. Awareness of these defects is essential for avoiding complications during surgical procedures on the upper spine. The prevalence of arch defects was investigated in an open-access OPC-Radiomics (Radiomic Biomarkers in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma) dataset comprising 606 head and neck computed tomography scans from oropharyngeal cancer patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to generate prevalence estimates of atlas arch defects and propose a classification system for the anterior and combined atlas arch defects. The posterior arch defect was found in 20 patients (3.3%) out of the 606 patients investigated. The anterior arch defect was not observed in any patient, while a combined arch defect was observed in one patient (0.2%). A meta-analysis of 13,539 participants from 14 studies, including the present study, yielded a pooled-posterior arch defect prevalence of 2.07% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22%–2.92%). The prevalences of anterior and combined arch defects were 0.00% (95% CI, 0.00%–0.10%) and 0.14% (95% CI, 0.04%–0.25%), respectively. The anterior and combined arch defects were classified into five subtypes based on their morphology and frequency. The present study showed that atlas arch defects were present in approximately 2% of the general population. For future studies, larger sample sizes should be used for studying arch defects to avoid the small-study effect and to predict the prevalence accurately. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Asian Spine Journal Vol.17 No.5 (2023) , 975-984 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.31616/asj.2023.0030 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 19767846 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 19761902 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85176583150 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/91138 | |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
dc.subject | Medicine | |
dc.title | Radiological Study of Atlas Arch Defects with Meta-Analysis and a Proposed New Classification | |
dc.type | Review | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176583150&origin=inward | |
oaire.citation.endPage | 984 | |
oaire.citation.issue | 5 | |
oaire.citation.startPage | 975 | |
oaire.citation.title | Asian Spine Journal | |
oaire.citation.volume | 17 | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Siriraj Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | The University of Queensland | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Chulabhorn Royal Academy | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Ochsner Health | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Tulane University School of Medicine | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Mahidol University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Kurume University School of Medicine | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | St. George’s University |