Radiological Study of Atlas Arch Defects with Meta-Analysis and a Proposed New Classification

dc.contributor.authorSuphamungmee W.
dc.contributor.authorYurasakpong L.
dc.contributor.authorPoonudom K.
dc.contributor.authorTubbs R.S.
dc.contributor.authorIwanaga J.
dc.contributor.authorKruepunga N.
dc.contributor.authorChaiyamoon A.
dc.contributor.authorSuwannakhan A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-22T18:02:00Z
dc.date.available2023-11-22T18:02:00Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study consists of a retrospective cohort study, a systematic review, and a meta-analysis which were separately conducted. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of atlas arch defects, generate an evidence-based synthesis, and propose a common classification system for the anterior and combined atlas arch defects. Atlas arch defects are well-corticated gaps in the anterior or posterior arch of the atlas. When both arches are involved, it is known as a combined arch defect. Awareness of these defects is essential for avoiding complications during surgical procedures on the upper spine. The prevalence of arch defects was investigated in an open-access OPC-Radiomics (Radiomic Biomarkers in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma) dataset comprising 606 head and neck computed tomography scans from oropharyngeal cancer patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to generate prevalence estimates of atlas arch defects and propose a classification system for the anterior and combined atlas arch defects. The posterior arch defect was found in 20 patients (3.3%) out of the 606 patients investigated. The anterior arch defect was not observed in any patient, while a combined arch defect was observed in one patient (0.2%). A meta-analysis of 13,539 participants from 14 studies, including the present study, yielded a pooled-posterior arch defect prevalence of 2.07% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22%–2.92%). The prevalences of anterior and combined arch defects were 0.00% (95% CI, 0.00%–0.10%) and 0.14% (95% CI, 0.04%–0.25%), respectively. The anterior and combined arch defects were classified into five subtypes based on their morphology and frequency. The present study showed that atlas arch defects were present in approximately 2% of the general population. For future studies, larger sample sizes should be used for studying arch defects to avoid the small-study effect and to predict the prevalence accurately.
dc.identifier.citationAsian Spine Journal Vol.17 No.5 (2023) , 975-984
dc.identifier.doi10.31616/asj.2023.0030
dc.identifier.eissn19767846
dc.identifier.issn19761902
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85176583150
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/91138
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleRadiological Study of Atlas Arch Defects with Meta-Analysis and a Proposed New Classification
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176583150&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage984
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPage975
oaire.citation.titleAsian Spine Journal
oaire.citation.volume17
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe University of Queensland
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
oairecerif.author.affiliationChulabhorn Royal Academy
oairecerif.author.affiliationOchsner Health
oairecerif.author.affiliationTulane University School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationKurume University School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationSt. George’s University

Files

Collections