Propensity Score–matched Analysis of 30-day Outcomes of Suction Versus Nonsuction Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy from a Real-World Multicenter Prospective Study: Collaboration Between the European Association of Urology Endourology Section and the Asian Urological Society of Endoluminal Surgery and Technology
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
24054569
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105025582070
Pubmed ID
41421929
Journal Title
European Urology Focus
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
European Urology Focus (2025)
Suggested Citation
Yuen S.K.K., Pek G.X.W., Herrmann T., Castellani D., Fong K.Y., Kalathia J., Zhu W., Tak G.R., Cepeda M., Gadzhiev N., Malkhasyan V., Al Hadithi M., Kukreja R., Chawla A., Agrawal M.S., Vaddi C.M., Inoue T., Dhandapani V., Akdogan N., Tefik T., Kumar N., Petkova K., Baker A., Tan K.M., Ketsuwan C., Laymon M., Sarica K., Omar M., Martov A., Zeng G., Somani B.K., Gauhar V. Propensity Score–matched Analysis of 30-day Outcomes of Suction Versus Nonsuction Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy from a Real-World Multicenter Prospective Study: Collaboration Between the European Association of Urology Endourology Section and the Asian Urological Society of Endoluminal Surgery and Technology. European Urology Focus (2025). doi:10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.011 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/113744
Title
Propensity Score–matched Analysis of 30-day Outcomes of Suction Versus Nonsuction Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy from a Real-World Multicenter Prospective Study: Collaboration Between the European Association of Urology Endourology Section and the Asian Urological Society of Endoluminal Surgery and Technology
Author(s)
Yuen S.K.K.
Pek G.X.W.
Herrmann T.
Castellani D.
Fong K.Y.
Kalathia J.
Zhu W.
Tak G.R.
Cepeda M.
Gadzhiev N.
Malkhasyan V.
Al Hadithi M.
Kukreja R.
Chawla A.
Agrawal M.S.
Vaddi C.M.
Inoue T.
Dhandapani V.
Akdogan N.
Tefik T.
Kumar N.
Petkova K.
Baker A.
Tan K.M.
Ketsuwan C.
Laymon M.
Sarica K.
Omar M.
Martov A.
Zeng G.
Somani B.K.
Gauhar V.
Pek G.X.W.
Herrmann T.
Castellani D.
Fong K.Y.
Kalathia J.
Zhu W.
Tak G.R.
Cepeda M.
Gadzhiev N.
Malkhasyan V.
Al Hadithi M.
Kukreja R.
Chawla A.
Agrawal M.S.
Vaddi C.M.
Inoue T.
Dhandapani V.
Akdogan N.
Tefik T.
Kumar N.
Petkova K.
Baker A.
Tan K.M.
Ketsuwan C.
Laymon M.
Sarica K.
Omar M.
Martov A.
Zeng G.
Somani B.K.
Gauhar V.
Author's Affiliation
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hannover Medical School
Stellenbosch University
İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi
Singapore General Hospital
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal
Faculty of Medicine
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Ramathibodi Hospital
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona
Menoufia University Faculty of Medicine
Hospital Universitario Río Hortega
Biruni Üniversitesi
Çukurova Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center FMBA
Military Medical Academy, Sofia
Kantonsspital Frauenfeld
Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital
Ng Teng Fong General Hospital
Hara Genitourinary Hospital
Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology
Hazm Mebaireek General Hospital
Ford Hospital and Research Centre
Fortune Urology Clinic
Veterans Memorial Medical Center
Pushpanjali Hospital & Research Centre
Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology
Urocare Hospital
Ramadi Teaching Hospital
Remedy Hospital LN
Hannover Medical School
Stellenbosch University
İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi
Singapore General Hospital
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal
Faculty of Medicine
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Ramathibodi Hospital
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona
Menoufia University Faculty of Medicine
Hospital Universitario Río Hortega
Biruni Üniversitesi
Çukurova Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center FMBA
Military Medical Academy, Sofia
Kantonsspital Frauenfeld
Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital
Ng Teng Fong General Hospital
Hara Genitourinary Hospital
Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology
Hazm Mebaireek General Hospital
Ford Hospital and Research Centre
Fortune Urology Clinic
Veterans Memorial Medical Center
Pushpanjali Hospital & Research Centre
Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology
Urocare Hospital
Ramadi Teaching Hospital
Remedy Hospital LN
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background and objective: This study compares 30-d perioperative outcomes between suction mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (S-mPCNL) and nonsuction mPCNL (NS-mPCNL). Methods: This prospective multicenter study involved 20 surgeons from 14 countries. The primary outcome was the 30-d stone free rate (SFR) on computed tomography. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with 100% SFR and the overall complication rate. Key findings and limitations: PSM for 1915 patients (1534 S-mPCNL, 381 NS-mPCNL) yielded a cohort of 664 S-mPCNL and 309 NS-mPCNL cases for analysis. Baseline and stone characteristics were well matched. The 30-d 100% SFR (grade A) was high in both groups and did not significantly differ (85% vs 87%; odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–1.49; p = 0.9). The S-mPCNL group had a shorter median operative time (43 vs 57 min), higher intraoperative SFR according to visual inspection or fluoroscopy (82% vs 70%), and lower blood transfusion rate (1.3% vs 3.6%). There was no between-group difference in infectious complications. Multivariable analysis revealed that stone volume (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87–0.99; p = 0.021) and single-step dilatation (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.85–5.81; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with grade A SFR. Limitations include variability in practice. Conclusions and clinical implications: Suction during mPCNL improves intraoperative stone clearance rates and reduces the operative time, with no significant difference in 30-d SFR or infectious complications. Both S-mPCNL and NS-mPCNL achieve high rates of zero residual fragments.
