Benefit of Paraaortic Lymph Node Evaluation in Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma; A 10-year retrospective study in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorJaishuen A.
dc.contributor.authorWisarnsirirak P.
dc.contributor.authorPetsuksiri J.
dc.contributor.authorInthasorn P.
dc.contributor.authorKuljarusnont S.
dc.contributor.authorKhemworapong K.
dc.contributor.authorPoonyakanok V.
dc.contributor.correspondenceJaishuen A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T18:35:51Z
dc.date.available2024-10-31T18:35:51Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate 5-year survival in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, who underwent evaluation of retroperitoneal pelvic lymph nodes alone, compared to evaluation of pelvic with paraaortic lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 636 women who were diagnosed with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and underwent surgical staging at Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University between January 2006 and December 2015. Patients who underwent pelvic lymph node evaluation (n = 257) and pelvic with paraaortic lymph node evaluation (n = 379) were included. Results: The median follow-up time was 60 months. The 5-year overall survival rate (OS) in the pelvic lymph node (PLN) and pelvic with paraaortic lymph node (PPALN) groups was 81.6% and 87.7%, respectively (p = 0.073). However, the PPALN group had significantly longer survival than the PLN group after adjustment for other prognostic factors (adjusted hazard ratio (HR)) 1.63 (1.06-2.52, p = 0.028)).There was a trend to improve 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) for the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)/ European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)/ European Society of Pathology (ESP) high risk patients, who underwent PPALN evaluation (85.6%) compared with PLN evaluation (70.8%), p = 0.061. Conclusion: In endometrioid endometrial carcinoma patients, the evaluation of pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes is independently associated with enhanced survival outcomes. Therefore, in situations when a sentinel lymph node biopsy is not feasible, we suggest evaluating the pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes for all patients diagnosed with endometrioid endometrial cancer.
dc.identifier.citationThai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Vol.32 No.5 (2024) , 340-357
dc.identifier.doi10.14456/tjog.2024.38
dc.identifier.eissn26730871
dc.identifier.issn08576084
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85207116149
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101840
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleBenefit of Paraaortic Lymph Node Evaluation in Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma; A 10-year retrospective study in Thailand
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85207116149&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage357
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPage340
oaire.citation.titleThai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
oaire.citation.volume32
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Thammasat University

Files

Collections