High-Level Mobility of Trans-Tibial Prosthesis Users Wearing Commercial and sPace Energy-Storing Prosthetic Feet
7
item.page.dc.date.issued
2022-10-01
item.page.dc.type
item.page.dc.identifier.issn
16617827
item.page.dc.identifier.eissn
16604601
item.page.dc.identifier.doi
item.page.dc.identifier.scopus
2-s2.0-85139811966
item.page.dc.identifier.pmid
36231917
item.page.oaire.citation.title
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
item.page.oaire.citation.volume
19
item.page.oaire.citation.issue
19
item.page.dc.rights.holder
SCOPUS
item.page.dc.identifier.citation
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Vol.19 No.19 (2022)
punsarn.item.page.citation
Rakbangboon T., Guerra G., Kla-arsa S., Padungjaroen U., Tangpornprasert P., Virulsri C., Sasaki K. High-Level Mobility of Trans-Tibial Prosthesis Users Wearing Commercial and sPace Energy-Storing Prosthetic Feet. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Vol.19 No.19 (2022). doi:10.3390/ijerph191912606 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84673
item.page.dc.title
High-Level Mobility of Trans-Tibial Prosthesis Users Wearing Commercial and sPace Energy-Storing Prosthetic Feet
item.page.dc.contributor.author
item.page.oairecerif.author.affiliation
item.page.dc.contributor.other
item.page.dc.description.abstract
Outcomes of users provided with a commercial ESR Vari-Flex foot (Össur, Reykjavik, Iceland) and a locally designed sPace foot were investigated. Step activity with users’ own prosthetic foot compared to the sPace foot was explored. Methods: Eleven individuals with unilateral trans-tibial amputation participated and were provided with an sPace and Vari-Flex foot. Ten- and twenty-meter walk tests (10/20MWT) at comfortable and fast walking speeds (CWS/FWS), the two-minute walk test (2-MWT) and Comprehensive High-Level Activity Mobility Predictor (CHAMP) were administered. A subgroup was provided a pedometer to record their steps over a 7-day period in their own foot and later the sPace. Results: The sPace foot performed well in a battery of high-level mobility outcome measures. On CHAMP, participants scored 16.94 ± 5.41 and 16.72 ± 6.09 with the sPace and Vari-Flex feet, respectively. Subgroup testing of step activity showed 4490 ± 3444 steps in users’ own feet and 3115 ± 1967 in the sPace foot, p = 0.176. Conclusions: Participants using the sPace foot were capable of performing walking, high-level mobility and activity outcome measures.