Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group

dc.contributor.authorChotiyarnwong P.
dc.contributor.authorMcCloskey E.V.
dc.contributor.authorHarvey N.C.
dc.contributor.authorLorentzon M.
dc.contributor.authorPrieto-Alhambra D.
dc.contributor.authorAbrahamsen B.
dc.contributor.authorAdachi J.D.
dc.contributor.authorBorgström F.
dc.contributor.authorBruyere O.
dc.contributor.authorCarey J.J.
dc.contributor.authorClark P.
dc.contributor.authorCooper C.
dc.contributor.authorCurtis E.M.
dc.contributor.authorDennison E.
dc.contributor.authorDiaz-Curiel M.
dc.contributor.authorDimai H.P.
dc.contributor.authorGrigorie D.
dc.contributor.authorHiligsmann M.
dc.contributor.authorKhashayar P.
dc.contributor.authorLewiecki E.M.
dc.contributor.authorLips P.
dc.contributor.authorLorenc R.S.
dc.contributor.authorOrtolani S.
dc.contributor.authorPapaioannou A.
dc.contributor.authorSilverman S.
dc.contributor.authorSosa M.
dc.contributor.authorSzulc P.
dc.contributor.authorWard K.A.
dc.contributor.authorYoshimura N.
dc.contributor.authorKanis J.A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T17:39:06Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T17:39:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-01
dc.description.abstractSummary: The IOF Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group has reviewed the potential role of population screening for high hip fracture risk against well-established criteria. The report concludes that such an approach should strongly be considered in many health care systems to reduce the burden of hip fractures. Introduction: The burden of long-term osteoporosis management falls on primary care in most healthcare systems. However, a wide and stable treatment gap exists in many such settings; most of which appears to be secondary to a lack of awareness of fracture risk. Screening is a public health measure for the purpose of identifying individuals who are likely to benefit from further investigations and/or treatment to reduce the risk of a disease or its complications. The purpose of this report was to review the evidence for a potential screening programme to identify postmenopausal women at increased risk of hip fracture. Methods: The approach took well-established criteria for the development of a screening program, adapted by the UK National Screening Committee, and sought the opinion of 20 members of the International Osteoporosis Foundation’s Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life as to whether each criterion was met (yes, partial or no). For each criterion, the evidence base was then reviewed and summarized. Results and Conclusion: The report concludes that evidence supports the proposal that screening for high fracture risk in primary care should strongly be considered for incorporation into many health care systems to reduce the burden of fractures, particularly hip fractures. The key remaining hurdles to overcome are engagement with primary care healthcare professionals, and the implementation of systems that facilitate and maintain the screening program.
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Osteoporosis Vol.17 No.1 (2022)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11657-022-01117-6
dc.identifier.eissn18623514
dc.identifier.issn18623522
dc.identifier.pmid35763133
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132973607
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85292
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleIs it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132973607&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleArchives of Osteoporosis
oaire.citation.volume17
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversité de Lyon
oairecerif.author.affiliationGhent university, Center for Microsystems Technology
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity Hospital Galway
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Carol Davila din Bucuresti
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México
oairecerif.author.affiliationMcMaster University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Oxford
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe University of Tokyo
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Southampton
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz
oairecerif.author.affiliationSyddansk Universitet
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversiteit Maastricht
oairecerif.author.affiliationGöteborgs Universitet
oairecerif.author.affiliationCedars-Sinai Medical Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationKarolinska Institutet
oairecerif.author.affiliationC.I. Parhon Institute of Endocrinology
oairecerif.author.affiliationAustralian Catholic University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe Sheffield Medical School
oairecerif.author.affiliationVrije Universiteit Amsterdam
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Galway
oairecerif.author.affiliationIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano
oairecerif.author.affiliationMedizinische Universität Graz
oairecerif.author.affiliationNew Mexico Clinical Research and Osteoporosis Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationHolbæk Sygehus
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe University of Sheffield
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstituto de Salud Carlos III
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversité de Liège
oairecerif.author.affiliationGERAS Centre for Aging Research
oairecerif.author.affiliationSOMED
oairecerif.author.affiliationQuantify Research

Files

Collections