Prick and intradermal skin tests in patients with severe hymenoptera sting allergy using commercial versus in-house allergen extracts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fire ant, honey bee, and wasp allergen extracts are useful in the diagnosis and treatment of severe Hymenoptera allergic patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the result of skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (ID) compared between local and commercial insect allergen extracts in patients with severe Hymenoptera sting allergy. METHODS: SPT and ID using local and commercial insect allergen extracts were performed. Specific IgE (sIgE) to honey bee, wasp, and fire ant; component-resolved diagnosis (CRD); (rApi m1, rApi m2, rApi m3, rApi m5, rApi m10, rVes v5, rPol d5, and rVes v1); and, cross-reactive carbohydrate determinant (CCD) were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included. Twenty-five had anaphylaxis, and 2 had severe systemic skin reaction. Positive skin test (SPT and/or ID) result from local and commercial allergen extracts was 74% vs. 67% for fire ant, 48% vs. 59% for honey bee, and 52% vs. 74% for yellowjacket. Local and commercial allergen extracts showed substantial agreement for fire ant (k = 0.647, p = 0.001) and honey bee (k = 0.632, p = 0.001), and moderate agreement for wasp (k = 0.547, p = 0.001). When compared with sIgE subtracted with CCD and/or CRD, skin test results of local fire ant allergen extract showed higher sensitivity (87% vs. 67%), specificity (42% vs. 33%), and accuracy (67% vs. 52%) than commercial extract. Commercial honey bee and wasp showed higher sensitivity (62% vs. 50%, 85% vs. 65%) and accuracy (63% vs. 52%, 78% vs. 70%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SPT and ID with local or commercial insect venoms could help in confirming and/or identifying the causative insects.