Trehalose versus carboxymethylcellulose oral spray for relieving radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial
dc.contributor.author | Piboonratanakit P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ferreira J.N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pravinvongvuthi K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Maison K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Urkasemsin G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Boonroung T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Prayongrat A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lertbutsayanukul C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sucharitakul J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Vacharaksa A. | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-24T17:07:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-24T17:07:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-12-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of trehalose oral spray to relieve radiation-induced xerostomia on a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods: Prior to RCT, the effect of trehalose (5–20%) on the epithelial growth of fetal mouse salivary gland (SG) explants was evaluated to confirm if 10% trehalose exerted the best epithelial outcomes. Participants who completed radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment were enrolled in a double-blind RCT, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria as per the CONSORT statement. The experimental group (n = 35) received 10% trehalose spray, while the control group (n = 35) received carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) spray to apply intra-orally 4 times/day for 14 days. Salivary pH and unstimulated salivary flow rate were recorded pre- and post-interventions. The Xerostomia-related Quality of Life scale (XeQoLs) was filled, and scores assessed post-interventions. Results: In the SG explant model, pro-acinar epithelial growth and mitosis was supported by 10% topical trehalose. As for RCT outcomes, salivary pH and unstimulated salivary flow rate were significantly improved after use of 10% trehalose spray when compared to CMC (p < 0.05). Participants reported an improvement of XeQoLs dimension scores after using trehalose or CMC oral sprays in terms of physical, pain/discomfort, and psychological dimensions (p < 0.05), but not social (p > 0.05). When comparing between CMC and trehalose sprays, XeQoLs total scores were not statistically different (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The 10% trehalose spray improved salivary pH, unstimulated salivary flow rate, and the quality-of-life dimensions linked with physical, pain/discomfort, and psychological signs. The clinical efficacy of 10% trehalose spray was equivalent with CMC-based saliva substitutes for relieving radiation-induced xerostomia; therefore, trehalose may be suggested in alternative to CMC-based oral spray.(Thai Clinical Trials Registry; https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ TCTR20190817004). | |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Oral Health Vol.23 No.1 (2023) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12903-023-02966-4 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 14726831 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85159193684 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/82757 | |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
dc.subject | Dentistry | |
dc.title | Trehalose versus carboxymethylcellulose oral spray for relieving radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial | |
dc.type | Article | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159193684&origin=inward | |
oaire.citation.issue | 1 | |
oaire.citation.title | BMC Oral Health | |
oaire.citation.volume | 23 | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Chulalongkorn University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Mahidol University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University |