Understanding hospital antimicrobial prescribing decisions and determinants of uptake of new local antimicrobial prescribing guidelines in Laos
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
2398502X
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85204738957
Journal Title
Wellcome Open Research
Volume
9
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Wellcome Open Research Vol.9 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Chansamouth V., Douangnouvong A., Thammavongsa P., Sombandith X., Keomany S., Rattana S., Newton P.N., Day N.P.J., Turner P., Mayxay M., van Doorn H.R., Ashley E.A. Understanding hospital antimicrobial prescribing decisions and determinants of uptake of new local antimicrobial prescribing guidelines in Laos. Wellcome Open Research Vol.9 (2024). doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20884.2 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101414
Title
Understanding hospital antimicrobial prescribing decisions and determinants of uptake of new local antimicrobial prescribing guidelines in Laos
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial use in Laos is among the highest in Southeast Asia. The first Lao comprehensive antimicrobial prescribing guidelines have been available since 2021. This study explored the determinants of antibiotic prescribing decisions and how the new prescribing guidelines were being used. Methods: In August 2022, in-depth interviews were conducted with 16 Lao prescribers from two hospitals. Participants were questioned about their prescribing behaviours, attitudes to guidelines, how they learned about the guidelines and factors influencing their uptake. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Thematic analysis of the transcripts was conducted. Results: Lao prescribers considered multiple factors before deciding to prescribe antibiotics to their patients. The most common factor was based on the clinical judgement of the prescribers. Lack of certain antibiotics and turnaround times of laboratory results were the main challenges to prescribing antibiotics appropriately. The majority of participants were satisfied with the guidelines, regarding them as comprehensive, simple and convenient. However, most participants admitted that they did not access the guidelines very often. The main reason was that they could remember the treatment recommendations because they treat similar diseases on a daily basis. Improving antibiotic knowledge was the most common recommendation in order to improve the appropriate use of antibiotics. Raising awareness of the guidelines and promoting their use should also be considered. In addition, heads of the wards, and policy and implementation leaders, should support, monitor and feedback their use to encourage all prescribers to follow the guidelines. Conclusions: Several factors contribute to enhancing appropriate antibiotic prescription. Key factors for improving antibiotic prescription include enhancing prescribers' clinical knowledge, ensuring access to essential antibiotics, and updating guidelines regularly. Health leaders must get involved to promote their use.