Patterns and Outcomes of Treatment Failure after Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula: Analysis of 200 Failed Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Cases

dc.contributor.authorLohsiriwat V.
dc.contributor.authorJitmungngan R.
dc.contributor.authorWanitsuwan W.
dc.contributor.authorSirikurnpiboon S.
dc.contributor.authorChadbunchachai W.
dc.contributor.authorChandrachamnong P.
dc.contributor.authorOvartchaiyapong P.
dc.contributor.correspondenceLohsiriwat V.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-16T18:13:43Z
dc.date.available2026-02-16T18:13:43Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: – Despite generally favorable outcomes of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract for anal fistula, several patients experience persistent or recurrent disease. OBJECTIVE: – This study aimed to identify patterns of treatment failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract and evaluate their outcomes. DESIGN: – Multicenter retrospective study. SETTING: – Five university hospitals in Thailand. PATIENTS: – Those diagnosed with persistent or recurrent cryptoglandular anal fistula after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract between 2012 and 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: – Fistula characteristics, patterns of treatment failure and outcomes of subsequent management were analyzed. RESULTS: – A total of 200 patients were included, of whom 12.5% had persistent fistulas and 87.5% had recurrence. Median time to recurrence was 6 months (range, 1-48). Most treatment failures (n = 186, 93%) occurred within one year after surgery. Six distinct patterns of treatment failure were identified. The most common was type 1 (I–E, tract running from the previous internal opening (I) to an external opening (E) - known as an original fistula: n=116, 58%), followed by type 2 (I–L, tract running from the previous internal opening (I) to an unhealed intersphincteric wound - known as an intersphincteric fistula: n = 56, 28%). Type 1 failure was effectively treated by redo- ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract with an 87% success rate. Overall, the healing rate was 90.5% - with a median follow-up period of 18 months (range, 12-38). LIMITATIONS: – Exclusion of non-cryptoglandular fistulas may limit generalizability. The retrospective multicenter design and surgeon-dependent decision-making may have introduced selection bias and heterogeneity in surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: – Most treatment failures occurred within one year after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. Understanding the six distinct failure patterns enables more appropriate surgical decision-making. The majority represented either recurrence of the original tract or persistence within the intersphincteric space. See Video Abstract.
dc.identifier.citationDiseases of the Colon and Rectum (2026)
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/DCR.0000000000004142
dc.identifier.eissn15300358
dc.identifier.issn00123706
dc.identifier.pmid41614593
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105029658167
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/115096
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titlePatterns and Outcomes of Treatment Failure after Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula: Analysis of 200 Failed Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Cases
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105029658167&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
oairecerif.author.affiliationPrince of Songkla University
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationRajavithi Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationVajira Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSrinagarind Hospital

Files

Collections