The Biosafety Research Road Map: The Search for Evidence to Support Practices in Human and Veterinary Laboratories
Issued Date
2023-06-01
Resource Type
ISSN
15356760
eISSN
24701246
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85162196631
Journal Title
Applied Biosafety
Volume
28
Issue
2
Start Page
64
End Page
71
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Applied Biosafety Vol.28 No.2 (2023) , 64-71
Suggested Citation
Blacksell S.D., Dhawan S., Kusumoto M., Le K.K., Summermatter K., O'Keefe J., Kozlovac J., Almuhairi S.S., Sendow I., Scheel C.M., Ahumibe A., Masuku Z.M., Bennett A.M., Kojima K., Harper D.R., Hamilton K. The Biosafety Research Road Map: The Search for Evidence to Support Practices in Human and Veterinary Laboratories. Applied Biosafety Vol.28 No.2 (2023) , 64-71. 71. doi:10.1089/apb.2022.0040 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/87667
Title
The Biosafety Research Road Map: The Search for Evidence to Support Practices in Human and Veterinary Laboratories
Author's Affiliation
World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH)
Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
UK Health Security Agency
Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
Nigeria Centre for Disease Control
National Institute for Communicable Diseases
Organisation Mondiale de la Santé
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Chatham House
University of Bern
Nuffield Department of Medicine
USDA ARS Beltsville Agricultural Research Center
Abu Dhabi Agriculture and Food Safety Authority
Ministry for Primary Industries
Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
UK Health Security Agency
Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
Nigeria Centre for Disease Control
National Institute for Communicable Diseases
Organisation Mondiale de la Santé
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Chatham House
University of Bern
Nuffield Department of Medicine
USDA ARS Beltsville Agricultural Research Center
Abu Dhabi Agriculture and Food Safety Authority
Ministry for Primary Industries
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Introduction: Lack of evidence-based information regarding potential biological risks can result in inappropriate or excessive biosafety and biosecurity risk-reduction strategies. This can cause unnecessary damage and loss to the physical facilities, physical and psychological well-being of laboratory staff, and community trust. A technical working group from the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE), World Health Organization (WHO), and Chatham House collaborated on the Biosafety Research Roadmap (BRM) project. The goal of the BRM is the sustainable implementation of evidence-based biorisk management of laboratory activities, particularly in low-resource settings, and the identification of gaps in the current biosafety and biosecurity knowledge base. Methods: A literature search was conducted for the basis of laboratory design and practices for four selected high-priority subgroups of pathogenic agents. Potential gaps in biosafety were focused on five main sections, including the route of inoculation/modes of transmission, infectious dose, laboratory-acquired infections, containment releases, and disinfection and decontamination strategies. Categories representing miscellaneous, respiratory, bioterrorism/zoonotic, and viral hemorrhagic fever pathogens were created within each group were selected for review. Results: Information sheets on the pathogens were developed. Critical gaps in the evidence base for safe sustainable biorisk management were identified. Conclusion: The gap analysis identified areas of applied biosafety research required to support the safety, and the sustainability, of global research programs. Improving the data available for biorisk management decisions for research with high-priority pathogens will contribute significantly to the improvement and development of appropriate and necessary biosafety, biocontainment and biosecurity strategies for each agent.