Identifying and Prioritizing the Moral Virtue Indicators for Undergraduate Nursing Students: Measurement Invariance Testing Across Class Levels
9
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
19761317
eISSN
20937482
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105003247298
Pubmed ID
39986377
Journal Title
Asian Nursing Research
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Asian Nursing Research (2025)
Suggested Citation
Orathai P., Chuengkriangkrai B., Chaimo K. Identifying and Prioritizing the Moral Virtue Indicators for Undergraduate Nursing Students: Measurement Invariance Testing Across Class Levels. Asian Nursing Research (2025). doi:10.1016/j.anr.2025.01.006 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109904
Title
Identifying and Prioritizing the Moral Virtue Indicators for Undergraduate Nursing Students: Measurement Invariance Testing Across Class Levels
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify and prioritize the importance of the moral virtue indicators for undergraduate nursing students and to test the noninvariant indicators across class levels. Methods: Secondary data from a sample of 1,000 Thai undergraduate nursing students from two nursing education institutes (one university nursing school and one nursing college of the Ministry of Public Health) were split into the first-, second-, third-, and fourth-year student groups (n = 247, 229, 246, and 278, respectively). A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to identify and prioritize the importance of the moral virtue indicators in four student groups separately. The noninvariant indicators testing across the four class levels was used using multiple-group analysis. Results: The 10 indicators were crucial for nursing students' moral virtue across the first to fourth years. The most important indicator for the first- and second-year student nurses was cooperation, while honesty was the most crucial indicator for the third-year student nurses, and caring was the most dominant indicator for the fourth-year student nurses. The testing of noninvariant indicators confirmed that each indicator contributed differently to the moral virtue of junior and senior students. Conclusion: The findings spotlight the importance of the 10 moral virtue indicators for undergraduate nursing students. Besides, the junior and senior student nurses prioritized the importance of the 10 indicators measuring moral virtue differently. Therefore, administrators and nurse educators should provide the ethical scenarios and issues for classroom discussion and implement clinically authentic case-based simulations with timely feedback in laboratories for junior students. A regulatory process on moral virtues, using critical reflection, assessment criteria, and multirater assessors, should be deliberated in clinical training for senior students so that they adhere to moral virtues. These tailored strategies may help student nurses recognize their ethical behavior and gain personal and professional development as future nurses.