Barriers and Perceptions Regarding Research Among Ophthalmology Residents in Thailand: A Descriptive Study
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
22288082
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85211039815
Journal Title
Siriraj Medical Journal
Volume
76
Issue
12
Start Page
854
End Page
864
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Siriraj Medical Journal Vol.76 No.12 (2024) , 854-864
Suggested Citation
Mukdar Y., Sermsripong W., Sanphan W., Sawangkul S., Choopong P. Barriers and Perceptions Regarding Research Among Ophthalmology Residents in Thailand: A Descriptive Study. Siriraj Medical Journal Vol.76 No.12 (2024) , 854-864. 864. doi:10.33192/smj.v76i12.270324 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/102359
Title
Barriers and Perceptions Regarding Research Among Ophthalmology Residents in Thailand: A Descriptive Study
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the barriers and perceptions of ophthalmology residents toward research and to discern the differences between residents with and without prior research experience before commencing ophthalmology training. Materials and Methods: An online survey using Google Forms was conducted to collect data. The survey comprised three sections: general information, research obstacles, and attitudes. Participants utilized a 5-point Likert scale for reporting agreement. Results: The survey was completed by 122 ophthalmology residents, representing a 51.3% response rate. Among them, 54.1% reported having research experience before residency. The top three obstacles identified were “lack of statistical knowledge” (mean 3.80, standard deviation 1.18), “lack of knowledge and experience in manuscript writing” (mean 3.79, SD 1.21), and “lack of time due to routine workload” (mean 3.75, SD 1.15). Residents without research experience demonstrated significantly greater difficulties in research skills, manuscript preparation, and motivation for research submission. While overall research attitudes were positive (mean 3.20, SD 1.18), residents with prior experience displayed significantly more favorable dispositions across various facets of research. These were preferences, perceived educational and career advantages, potential for income generation, and enhancement of communication skills. Conversely, the non-experienced residents primarily viewed research as a graduation requirement. Conclusion: Ophthalmology residents encountered considerable challenges in conducting research, primarily stemming from limited statistical knowledge and inadequate competency in manuscript writing. Implementing targeted support measures to address these barriers can foster positive research attitudes and encourage sustained research engagement among residents.