Lumbar stabilization exercise with and without real-time ultrasound imaging biofeedback in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial
| dc.contributor.author | Sarafadeen R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ganiyu S.O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ibrahim A.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Akindele M.O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Awotidebe A.W. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kaka B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bello B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wattananon P. | |
| dc.contributor.correspondence | Sarafadeen R. | |
| dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-30T18:16:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-30T18:16:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Reduced lumbar multifidus (LM) cross-sectional area (CSA) has been linked with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP); hence, lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) is typically used as treatment. Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) biofeedback can enhance performance and retention in LM activation. This study aimed to compare the effects of LSE with or without RUSI-biofeedback in patients with NCLBP. A single-blind, three-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial involving 90 participants, randomized into LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback,</inf> LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf>, or minimal intervention (n = 30 per group) was conducted. All interventions were administered twice weekly for 8 weeks, and outcomes (LM-CSA, pain, disability, and quality of life) were evaluated before and at 8-week and 20-week follow-ups. Compared to LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf> and minimal intervention, LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf> demonstrated a greater increase (p < 0.05) in LM-CSA at 8 weeks (mean [95%CI] difference: 0.81 [0–1.62] and 1.79 [0.91–2.65], respectively) and at 20 weeks (1.61 [0.79–2.42] and 2.66 [1.79–2.53], respectively). LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf> showed a greater improvement (p < 0.05) in mental health scores at 8 weeks (3.63 [0.32–6.94]) and 20 weeks (7.34 [4.03–10.60]) compared to LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf>. However, LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf> showed a greater physical health scores at 20 weeks (− 4.89 [− 7.92 to − 1.86]) compared to LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf>. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf> and LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf> for pain or disability. The increase in LM-CSA significantly correlated with changes in pain (r = − 0.40 to − 0.50, p < 0.05) and disability (r = − 0.38 to − 0.42, p < 0.05). In conclusion, LSE with or without RUSI-biofeedback improved LM-CSA, pain, disability, and quality of life. However, LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf> led to a greater increase in LM-CSA. Such an increase appears to be related to changes in pain and disability. Trial registration: The study was registered in the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (16/01/2018; PACTR201801002980602). | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Scientific Reports Vol.15 No.1 (2025) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41598-025-20942-6 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 20452322 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105019600712 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/112815 | |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
| dc.subject | Multidisciplinary | |
| dc.title | Lumbar stabilization exercise with and without real-time ultrasound imaging biofeedback in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105019600712&origin=inward | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 1 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Scientific Reports | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 15 | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Mahidol University | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | North-West University | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Bayero University | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | College of Health Sciences | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Tishk International University | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | National Orthopedic Hospital |
