Lumbar stabilization exercise with and without real-time ultrasound imaging biofeedback in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorSarafadeen R.
dc.contributor.authorGaniyu S.O.
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim A.A.
dc.contributor.authorAkindele M.O.
dc.contributor.authorAwotidebe A.W.
dc.contributor.authorKaka B.
dc.contributor.authorBello B.
dc.contributor.authorWattananon P.
dc.contributor.correspondenceSarafadeen R.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-30T18:16:44Z
dc.date.available2025-10-30T18:16:44Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-01
dc.description.abstractReduced lumbar multifidus (LM) cross-sectional area (CSA) has been linked with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP); hence, lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) is typically used as treatment. Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) biofeedback can enhance performance and retention in LM activation. This study aimed to compare the effects of LSE with or without RUSI-biofeedback in patients with NCLBP. A single-blind, three-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial involving 90 participants, randomized into LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback,</inf> LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf>, or minimal intervention (n = 30 per group) was conducted. All interventions were administered twice weekly for 8 weeks, and outcomes (LM-CSA, pain, disability, and quality of life) were evaluated before and at 8-week and 20-week follow-ups. Compared to LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf> and minimal intervention, LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf> demonstrated a greater increase (p < 0.05) in LM-CSA at 8 weeks (mean [95%CI] difference: 0.81 [0–1.62] and 1.79 [0.91–2.65], respectively) and at 20 weeks (1.61 [0.79–2.42] and 2.66 [1.79–2.53], respectively). LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf> showed a greater improvement (p < 0.05) in mental health scores at 8 weeks (3.63 [0.32–6.94]) and 20 weeks (7.34 [4.03–10.60]) compared to LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf>. However, LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf> showed a greater physical health scores at 20 weeks (− 4.89 [− 7.92 to − 1.86]) compared to LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf>. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf> and LSE<inf>no-biofeedback</inf> for pain or disability. The increase in LM-CSA significantly correlated with changes in pain (r = − 0.40 to − 0.50, p < 0.05) and disability (r = − 0.38 to − 0.42, p < 0.05). In conclusion, LSE with or without RUSI-biofeedback improved LM-CSA, pain, disability, and quality of life. However, LSE<inf>RUSI-biofeedback</inf> led to a greater increase in LM-CSA. Such an increase appears to be related to changes in pain and disability. Trial registration: The study was registered in the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (16/01/2018; PACTR201801002980602).
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports Vol.15 No.1 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-025-20942-6
dc.identifier.eissn20452322
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105019600712
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/112815
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary
dc.titleLumbar stabilization exercise with and without real-time ultrasound imaging biofeedback in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105019600712&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleScientific Reports
oaire.citation.volume15
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationNorth-West University
oairecerif.author.affiliationBayero University
oairecerif.author.affiliationCollege of Health Sciences
oairecerif.author.affiliationTishk International University
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Orthopedic Hospital

Files

Collections