A framework of stakeholder analysis for public participation in EIA process: a case study of Thailand
Issued Date
2023-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14615517
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85171745592
Journal Title
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (2023)
Suggested Citation
Kantamaturapoj K., Chanchitpricha C., Hongsuwan P., Suebsing P., Thaweesuk S., Wibulpolprasert S. A framework of stakeholder analysis for public participation in EIA process: a case study of Thailand. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (2023). doi:10.1080/14615517.2023.2261748 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/90239
Title
A framework of stakeholder analysis for public participation in EIA process: a case study of Thailand
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
This study aims to 1) investigate current stakeholder analysis in Thai Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reports, 2) explore the opinions of key informants regarding the elements of stakeholder analysis relevant to Thai EIA, and 3) develop a framework of stakeholder analysis for public participation (PP) in the Thai EIA process. Qualitative methods were employed by reviewing 18 EIA reports, interviewing 36 key informants, and brainstorming in a workshop to develop a framework. The proposed framework of stakeholder analysis includes five domains: 1) context exploration, 2) stakeholder identification, 3) stakeholder categorisation, 4) determination of participation level, and 5) participatory technique selection. The finding suggested that key elements considered in the domains should include the identification of vulnerable groups, the characterisation of stakeholders, getting multiple groups of people involved in determining participation level, and assigning professional facilitator(s) in PP. This study recommends applying conflict resolution strategies e.g. generating informal contact with potential mainstays before public consultation, involving key stakeholders in an advisory committee, and using a local academic mediator.