The implementation of PROMs/PREMs in the assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes: A questionnaire survey
3
Issued Date
2022-03-01
Resource Type
ISSN
22310762
eISSN
22501002
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85129077660
Journal Title
Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry
Volume
12
Issue
2
Start Page
210
End Page
215
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry Vol.12 No.2 (2022) , 210-215
Suggested Citation
Santiwong P., Sommaluan K., Mokkasak S., Rachuratchata C., Rattanaopas T., Sipiyaruk K. The implementation of PROMs/PREMs in the assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes: A questionnaire survey. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry Vol.12 No.2 (2022) , 210-215. 215. doi:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_275_21 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87521
Title
The implementation of PROMs/PREMs in the assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes: A questionnaire survey
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the impact of self-perceived treatment outcomes and experiences on psychological aspects, reflecting the importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in orthodontic practice. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was constructed using the PROMs/PREMs concepts. It contained five parts: 'Demographic data', 'Self-perceived esthetics', 'Self-perceived functional concern', 'Satisfaction of treatment procedures', and 'Psychological aspect'. The questionnaire was piloted in five experts and 50 orthodontic patients to ensure its quality, using content validity, test-retest reliability, and Cronbach's alpha. The validated version was provided to patients who had a complete fixed appliance orthodontic treatment. These data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation. In addition, a multiple linear regression was used to analyze whether there were any influential factors on a psychological aspect. Statistical significance was taken at P 0.05. Results: A total of 271 respondents completed the questionnaire. They tended to have positive perceptions toward the outcomes of orthodontic treatment. There was a significant difference in self-perceived esthetics between the male and female groups. Self-perceived esthetic and functional concerns as well as satisfaction of treatment procedures were found to have significant correlations with the psychological aspect. Sex and self-perceived esthetics were also found to be significant predictors of the psychological aspect. Conclusion: PROMs/PREMs should be considered as an important tool to assess treatment outcomes in orthodontic practice. There appeared to be significant impact of self-perceived esthetics on psychological aspects. Consequently, PROMs and PREMs should be introduced in orthodontic postgraduate programs to enhance the concept of patient-centered care in orthodontic practice.