An International Delphi Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria for Buerger's Disease

dc.contributor.authorFazeli B.
dc.contributor.authorPoredos P.
dc.contributor.authorSchernthaner G.
dc.contributor.authorStephen E.
dc.contributor.authorKozak M.
dc.contributor.authorCatalano M.
dc.contributor.authorPecsvarady Z.
dc.contributor.authorPatel M.
dc.contributor.authorAl Salman M.M.
dc.contributor.authorAltarazi L.
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad Bashar A.H.
dc.contributor.authorChua B.
dc.contributor.authorCvjetko I.
dc.contributor.authorDesai S.
dc.contributor.authorErer D.
dc.contributor.authorHussein E.
dc.contributor.authorGaddikeri P.
dc.contributor.authorIonac M.
dc.contributor.authorIwai T.
dc.contributor.authorKarahan O.
dc.contributor.authorKota A.
dc.contributor.authorKroger K.
dc.contributor.authorKumar P.P.
dc.contributor.authorMalecki R.
dc.contributor.authorMarcoccia A.
dc.contributor.authorPandey S.R.
dc.contributor.authorRavari H.
dc.contributor.authorSamuel V.
dc.contributor.authorSelvaraj D.
dc.contributor.authorSermsathanasawadi N.
dc.contributor.authorSharebiani H.
dc.contributor.authorSzuba A.
dc.contributor.authorTaheri H.
dc.contributor.authorZor M.H.
dc.contributor.authorLiew A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T17:45:19Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T17:45:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Buerger's disease (BD) remains a debilitating condition. Despite multiple published diagnostic criteria for BD, none is universally accepted as a gold standard. Methods: We conducted a 2-round modified Delphi consensus study to establish a consensus on the diagnostic. The questionnaire included statements from several commonly used diagnostic criteria for BD. Qualitative and quantitative analysis methods were performed. An agreement level of 70% was applied. Results: Twenty nine experts from 18 countries participated in this study. Overall, 75 statements were circulated in Round 1. Of these, 28% of statements were accepted. Following comments, 21 statements were recirculated in Round 2 and 90% were accepted. Although more than 90% of the experts did not agree that the diagnosis of BD can be based only on clinical manifestation, none of the nonclinical manifestations of BD were agreed as a part of the diagnostic criteria. There was an agreement that a history of tobacco consumption in any form, not necessarily confined to the current use, should be a part of the diagnostic criteria of BD. The history of thrombophlebitis migrans, even if not present at presentation, was accepted as a clue for BD diagnosis. It was also agreed that discoloration of the toes or fingers could be included in the diagnostic criteria of BD. Experts agreed that histology results could differentiate BD from atherosclerosis obliterans and other types of vasculitis. The presence of corkscrew collaterals on imaging and burning pain reached the agreement at the first round but not at the second. There was no consensus regarding age cut-off, the requirement of normal lipid profile, and normal blood glucose for BD diagnosis. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated discrepancies in the various published diagnostic criteria for BD and their selective utilization in routine clinical practice worldwide. We propose that all published diagnostic criteria for BD be re-evaluated for harmonization and universal use.
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Vascular Surgery Vol.85 (2022) , 211-218
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.avsg.2022.03.028
dc.identifier.eissn16155947
dc.identifier.issn08905096
dc.identifier.pmid35398199
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85130963506
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85613
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleAn International Delphi Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria for Buerger's Disease
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130963506&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage218
oaire.citation.startPage211
oaire.citation.titleAnnals of Vascular Surgery
oaire.citation.volume85
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat University
oairecerif.author.affiliationImmunology Research Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationVascular and Endovascular Surgery Research Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationSaolta University Health Care Group
oairecerif.author.affiliationOspedale Sandro Pertini
oairecerif.author.affiliationSultan Qaboos University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationClinical Hospital Merkur
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniverzitetni Klinični Center Ljubljana
oairecerif.author.affiliationGazi University, Faculty of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationAin Shams University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Victor Babes din Timisoara
oairecerif.author.affiliationKing Saud University
oairecerif.author.affiliationMedizinische Universität Wien
oairecerif.author.affiliationWroclaw Medical University
oairecerif.author.affiliationRamaiah Medical College
oairecerif.author.affiliationTokyo Medical and Dental University
oairecerif.author.affiliationOspedale Luigi Sacco - Polo Universitario
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases
oairecerif.author.affiliationChristian Medical College, Vellore
oairecerif.author.affiliationMukund Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationFarabi Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSlovenian Medical Academy
oairecerif.author.affiliationApollo-CVHF Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationVaricose Veins and Vascular Polyclinic (VVVC)
oairecerif.author.affiliationAnnapurna Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationNovena Specialist Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationHELIOS Klinik Krefeld
oairecerif.author.affiliationFlor Ferenc Teaching Hospital

Files

Collections