Validation of an Application-Based Cognitive Screening Test for Older Thai Adults
9
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14208008
eISSN
14219824
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85218760579
Pubmed ID
39746342
Journal Title
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (2025)
Suggested Citation
Yangyuensathaporn B., Chansaengpetch S., Jongsawadipatana A., Muangpaisan W. Validation of an Application-Based Cognitive Screening Test for Older Thai Adults. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (2025). doi:10.1159/000543309 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/105565
Title
Validation of an Application-Based Cognitive Screening Test for Older Thai Adults
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Introduction: The cognitive screening usually requires a face-to-face format, which might limit its use in many circumstances. We aimed to develop a new applicationbased cognitive screening test (ACST) to serve as an accessible and valid tool in the community. Methods: The ACST was developed by using paired association and digit span tests. This test was administered to 70 cognitively normal participants, 62 participants with MCI, and 64 participants with dementia. The 2nd edition of the Mini- Mental State Examination (MMSE-2) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were collected by certified psychologists. The ACST was self-administered by the participants, with a clinician providing instructions for those with dementia or technological limitations. The diagnosis was made according to DSM-5 criteria by an experienced geriatric neurologist blinded to the application score. Content validity, test-retest reliability, interrater reliability, and correlations between application scores and MMSE-2 and MoCA scores were analyzed. Results: The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing cognitively normal participants from non-normal participants were 92.9% and 70%, respectively (cutoff point ≤7). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between the cognitively normal group and the MCI group were 87.1% and 70%, respectively (cut point ≤7). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing cognitively normal participants from participants with dementia were 93.8% and 82.9%, respectively (cut point ≤6). A cutoff point ≤6 was considered suitable for participants aged 75 years or older or with 6 or fewer years of education. Discussion: The ACST is an easy-to-use and valid tool for cognitive screening in older Thai adults in clinical practice. Patients with an application score ≤7 are considered to be at risk of cognitive impairment and to require further evaluation.