The potential risk of ventilator-induced lung injury from five different PEEP titration techniques in ARDS
| dc.contributor.author | Sutherasan Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Songsomboon C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gulapa K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Junhasavasdikul D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Theerawit P. | |
| dc.contributor.correspondence | Sutherasan Y. | |
| dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-21T18:20:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-21T18:20:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-01-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains uncertain. This study compared the PEEP levels using five distinct titration methods to assess potential ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Methods: This study included 21 patients with moderate to severe ARDS who were monitored using esophageal balloon manometry and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). A recruitment maneuver followed by decremental PEEP titration was performed. Optimal PEEP (OP) was assessed using five criteria: highest respiratory system compliance (C<inf>RS</inf>), highest lung compliance (C<inf>L</inf>), end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (P<inf>tp_ee_direct</inf>) ≥ 0 cm H<inf>2</inf>O, elastance-derived end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (P<inf>tp_ei_derived</inf>) ≤ 25 cm H<inf>2</inf>O, and EIT-based analysis balancing the degree of overdistention and lung collapse. Results: Significant differences in OP were observed across the methods (p = 0.001): C<inf>RS</inf> 8.0 cmH₂O (8.0,13.9); C<inf>L</inf> 9.8 cmH₂O (8.0,14.0); P<inf>tp_ee_direct</inf> ≥ 0 cmH₂O 14.0 cm H₂O (11.9,17.9); P<inf>tp_ei_derived</inf> ≤ 25 cmH₂O 12.0 cmH₂O (10.0,13.9); EIT balancing the degree of overdistention and lung collapse 13.01 cmH₂O (9.88,14.78). The OP guided by P<inf>tp_ee_direct</inf> of ≥ 0 cm H<inf>2</inf>O is significantly higher than OP by the highest C<inf>RS</inf> (p = 0.001) and the highest C<inf>L</inf> (p = 0.002), and met the overdistension criteria, namely plateau pressure > 30 cm H<inf>2</inf>O and the highest percentage of overdistension by EIT. The PEEP guided by C<inf>RS</inf> had a higher potential risk of lung collapse, reflected by the negative value of P<inf>tp_ee_direct</inf> and a higher percentage of lung collapse by EIT. Conclusion: Transpulmonary pressure-guided PEEP titration yielded higher PEEP levels, while C<inf>RS</inf>-guided PEEP was lower and associated with a higher risk of collapse. Overdistension and collapse varied with the chosen PEEP method. In patients with moderate to severe ARDS, OP can vary depending on the method of assessment. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in Medicine Vol.12 (2025) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fmed.2025.1642064 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2296858X | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105015520904 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/112082 | |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.title | The potential risk of ventilator-induced lung injury from five different PEEP titration techniques in ARDS | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105015520904&origin=inward | |
| oaire.citation.title | Frontiers in Medicine | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 12 | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Ramathibodi Hospital | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University |
