Proteomic analysis investigating kidney transplantation outcomes- a scoping review

dc.contributor.authorRainey A.
dc.contributor.authorMcKay G.J.
dc.contributor.authorEnglish J.
dc.contributor.authorThakkinstian A.
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell A.P.
dc.contributor.authorCorr M.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-04T18:01:50Z
dc.date.available2023-12-04T18:01:50Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment option for most patients with end-stage kidney disease given the significantly lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to remaining on dialysis. Rejection and graft failure remain common in transplant recipients with limited improvement in long-term transplant outcomes despite therapeutic advances. There is an unmet need in the development of non-invasive biomarkers that specifically monitor graft function and predict transplant pathologies that affect outcomes. Despite the potential of proteomic investigatory approaches, up to now, no candidate biomarkers of sufficient sensitivity or specificity have translated into clinical use. The aim of this review was to collate and summarise protein findings and protein pathways implicated in the literature to date, and potentially flag putative biomarkers worth validating in independent patient cohorts. Methods: This review followed the Joanna Briggs’ Institute Methodology for a scoping review. MedlineALL, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception until December 2022. Abstract and full text review were undertaken independently by two reviewers. Data was collated using a pre-designed data extraction tool. Results: One hundred one articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority were single-centre retrospective studies of small sample size. Mass spectrometry was the most used technique to evaluate differentially expressed proteins between diagnostic groups and studies identified various candidate biomarkers such as immune or structural proteins. Discussion: Putative immune or structural protein candidate biomarkers have been identified using proteomic techniques in multiple sample types including urine, serum and fluid used to perfuse donor kidneys. The most consistent findings implicated proteins associated with tubular dysfunction and immunological regulatory pathways such as leukocyte trafficking. However, clinical translation and adoption of candidate biomarkers is limited, and these will require comprehensive evaluation in larger prospective, multicentre trials.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Nephrology Vol.24 No.1 (2023)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12882-023-03401-0
dc.identifier.eissn14712369
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85177642477
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/91273
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleProteomic analysis investigating kidney transplantation outcomes- a scoping review
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85177642477&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleBMC Nephrology
oaire.citation.volume24
oairecerif.author.affiliationQueen's University Belfast
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity College Cork
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Files

Collections