Vertical Relationship Ratio (VRR): A High Reliability and Accuracy Radiographic Measurement for Basilar Invagination in Rheumatoid Arthritis
4
Issued Date
2023-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
12341010
eISSN
16433750
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85182716195
Journal Title
Medical Science Monitor
Volume
30
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Medical Science Monitor Vol.30 (2023)
Suggested Citation
Ruangchainikom M., Korwutthikulrangsri E., Rattanatanasarn A., Kanjanakeereewong I., Boonsirikamchai W., Tirawanish P., Thanapipatsiri S., Sutipornpalangkul W. Vertical Relationship Ratio (VRR): A High Reliability and Accuracy Radiographic Measurement for Basilar Invagination in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Medical Science Monitor Vol.30 (2023). doi:10.12659/MSM.943329 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/95666
Title
Vertical Relationship Ratio (VRR): A High Reliability and Accuracy Radiographic Measurement for Basilar Invagination in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Previous radiographic measurements for diagnosis of a basilar invagination or impression (BI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were used as reference values based on anatomical reference distances. Due to the obscured anatomical landmarks, our group proposed a new radiographic measurement based on anatomic ratios to identify BI. Material/Methods: The vertical relationship ratio (VRR) was developed and evaluated. The VRR is the relationship between the distance obtained with the modified Ranawat method and the C3 vertebral body height. VRR was used to assess its ability to distinguish BI in 3 patient groups (28 RA with BI, 37 RA without BI, and 56 non-RA patients). The intra- and inter-observer reliability, the sensitivities, and specificities of all measurements were analyzed. The cutoff value of VRR measurement was calculated by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The VRR measurement showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliabilities. The VRR could significantly distinguish RA patients with BI from RA patients without BI. The mean VRR of RA patients with BI (1.82±0.20) was less than for the non-RA patients (2.26±0.19) and the RA patients without BI (2.24±0.19). The cutoff value of VRR from the ROC curve was below 2.025. Its sensitivity was 92.85%, specificity was 97.85%, positive predictive value was 92.86%, and negative predictive value was 97.84%. Conclusions: VRR has excellent intra-/inter-observer reliability and can distinguished BI in RA patients. We recommend using VRR in preference to the other available methods for assessment and screening BI in rheumatoid arthritis.