Vibratory Sorting for Pumice Removal in Microplastic Analysis of Coastal Sediment
1
Issued Date
2025-06-01
Resource Type
eISSN
26738929
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105009265783
Journal Title
Microplastics
Volume
4
Issue
2
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Microplastics Vol.4 No.2 (2025)
Suggested Citation
Yonaha Y., Nakagawa K., Shimizu K.I., Yagi M., Ussawarujikulchai A., Asakura H. Vibratory Sorting for Pumice Removal in Microplastic Analysis of Coastal Sediment. Microplastics Vol.4 No.2 (2025). doi:10.3390/microplastics4020030 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111086
Title
Vibratory Sorting for Pumice Removal in Microplastic Analysis of Coastal Sediment
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Density separation using a wet method is the standard technique for extracting microplastics (MPs) from coastal sediments. However, the 2021 Japanese submarine volcanic eruption introduced substantial pumice into these sediments, complicating the process. Pumice contamination in the floating matter from density separation significantly increases the workload of visual sorting. Pumice, distinguished by its spherical shape and hardness, exhibits distinct rolling and bouncing behaviors compared to plastic. In this study, we evaluated the sorting efficiency of a vibratory sorter in separating pumice from floating matter, comparing its performance with the existing methods. We analyzed the progressive behavior and the virtual sorting efficiency of single large- and medium-diameter particles using a vibrating plate and the actual sorting efficiency of mixed large-diameter particles. The maximum Newton’s efficiencies (η<inf>max</inf>) for the virtual sorting of single large-diameter pumice and plastic ranged from 0.74 to 1.00, and for medium-diameter particles, from 0.74 to 0.97. Sorting efficiency decreased with finer particles. The η<inf>max</inf> for the actual sorting of mixed large-diameter pumice and plastic was between 0.68 and 1.00, lower than the virtual sorting efficiency. While vibratory sorting, based on Newton’s efficiency, does not replace visual sorting, the time required for vibratory sorting is 21% of that required for visual sorting, making it valuable for estimating approximate MP quantities in coastal sediments. Additionally, this study provides a practical method for beach cleanups.