Validation of Self-application-based Malnutrition and Limited Mobility Screening Tools Compared with Standard Diagnostic Tools in Older Adults
| dc.contributor.author | Tanaviboon P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Muangpaisan W. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jongsawadipatana A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Siritipakorn P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Intalapaporn S. | |
| dc.contributor.correspondence | Tanaviboon P. | |
| dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-27T18:44:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-27T18:44:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-01-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To validate application screening tools against face-to-face standard tools (the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and Short Physical Performance Battery test (SPPB)) in older adults. Materials and Methods: A mobile or tablet application was developed based on user interfaces and experiences. Outpatients aged 60 years and over were tested with this tool. We used 2 questions from the WHO-ICOPE algorithm and 3 questions from the STEADI algorithm to screen for at-risk malnutrition and limited mobility, respectively. The MNA and SPPB were used to detect malnutrition and limited mobility, respectively, to test their validity. Results: The study involved 187 participants, 16% of whom were diagnosed with at-risk malnutrition by the MNA and 18.7% of whom had limited mobility according to the SPPB. The sensitivity and specificity of the malnutrition application tool were 66.6% and 96.1%, respectively. When BMI < 18.5 was combined in the application, the sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 91%, respectively. For limited mobility, the sensitivity and specificity of the application were 94.2% and 76.3%, respectively. The majority of participants rated the application for easy understanding as «excellent» (65%) and rated their confidence in their ability to use the application by themselves as “excellent” (70%). Conclusion: The application is an age-friendly, time-saving tool that can be used when face-to-face screening is difficult with good validity. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Siriraj Medical Journal Vol.77 No.1 (2025) , 29-38 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.33192/smj.v77i1.271719 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 22288082 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85215440248 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/103078 | |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.title | Validation of Self-application-based Malnutrition and Limited Mobility Screening Tools Compared with Standard Diagnostic Tools in Older Adults | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85215440248&origin=inward | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 38 | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 1 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 29 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Siriraj Medical Journal | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 77 | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Siriraj Hospital |
