Validation of pathology-based triage for the 21-gene recurrence score: A meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis of the Magee equations.
| dc.contributor.author | Susiriwatananont T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Eiamprapaporn P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sakornsakolpat P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Thanestada J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ma Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Liu Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Thompson E.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chumsri S. | |
| dc.contributor.correspondence | Susiriwatananont T. | |
| dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-23T18:18:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-23T18:18:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05-27 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: The 21-gene OncotypeDX (ODX) recurrence score (RS) is the standard for chemotherapy decision-making in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC), but cost limits accessibility in resource-constrained settings. The Magee equations (MEs) use routine pathology features (Nottingham grade and IHC; ER/PR/HER2/Ki-67) to estimate RS. We performed a meta-analysis to validate MEs performance as a triage tool for ODX testing and a qualitative synthesis to identify sources of discordance, highlighting the transition toward objective digital pathology AI models. Methods: A systematic review identified validation studies comparing MEs with RS in HR+ EBC. Studies with sufficient data to construct a 2X2 contingency table were included; neoadjuvant trials were excluded. Primary outcomes were Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for identifying low-risk cases (RS <26 for the current TAILORx cutoff and RS<31 for the historical cutoff) and ODX test sparing rate (TSR). Data were pooled using random-effects models. Qualitative themes regarding interpretation variability were extracted from study results and discussion sections. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 5396 patients in global cohorts from the USA, Mexico, Colombia, Jordan, France, Belgium, and Canada. For RS >26, Magee <18 achieved pooled NPV of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97) and TSR 61% (95% CI:51%-69%). For RS >31, NPV increased to 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.00) and TSR 52% (95% CI: 44%-59%). Pooled diagnostic performance for Magee <18 predicting RS <26 demonstrated 83% sensitivity and 71% specificity (AUC 0.81, LR+:2.53, LR-:0.28). Qualitative analysis of discordance identified: (1) Inter-observer variability: Nottingham mitotic counts and Ki-67 scoring were the primary drivers of score fluctuations. (2) IHC quantification: Variations in H-score calculation and Allred-to-H-score conversion introduced heterogeneity (3) Pre-analytical and biological factors: Inflammation and stromal proliferation occasionally inflated genomic RS; selection of non-representative blocks and intratumor heterogeneity further contributed to discordance (4) Technological solutions: Digital pathology and AI models emerge as solutions to standardize these variables. Conclusions: Magee-based triage provides a safe and cost-effective strategy for HR+ EBC risk stratification, with NPV up to 99% for excluding high-risk disease and sparing up to 61% of ODX testing. These results confirm a robust histopathological signal. Transitioning to objective digital pathomics provides a pathway to reduce manual subjectivity and democratize precision oncology globally. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol.44 No.16 (2026) , 1591-1591 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1200/JCO.2026.44.16_suppl.1591 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 15277755 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0732183X | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105041986990 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/117497 | |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
| dc.subject | Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.title | Validation of pathology-based triage for the 21-gene recurrence score: A meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis of the Magee equations. | |
| dc.type | Review | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105041986990&origin=inward | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 1591 | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 16 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 1591 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Journal of Clinical Oncology | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 44 | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Siriraj Hospital | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Maharaj Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital |
