sustainable dietary guidelines in Brazil

dc.contributor.authorNorde M.
dc.contributor.authorCacau L.T.
dc.contributor.authorBromage S.
dc.contributor.authorMarchioni D.M.L.
dc.contributor.authorVasques A.
dc.contributor.authorde Carvalho A.M.
dc.contributor.authorDeitchler M.
dc.contributor.authorVelloso L.A.
dc.contributor.authorGiovannucci E.
dc.contributor.authorGeloneze B.
dc.contributor.correspondenceNorde M.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T18:14:08Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T18:14:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: The world faces a global syndemic, in which diet is an important risk factor. The Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS) is a simple, timely and low-burden tool to track the contribution of diet to undernutrition and overnutrition globally. The Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) is an indicator of adherence to the EAT-Lancet Commission sustainable dietary guidelines. The present study aimed at investigating the correlation between the GDQS and PHDI in the Brazilian diet, to highlight concordances between them and shed light into the GDQS’ potential as a sustainable diet metric. Methods: The study was conducted in a nationally representative sample of 44,744 individuals aging ≥ 10 from the Household Budget Survey of Brazil, in which dietary data collection took place between 2017-2018, by trained interviewers using two 24-hour recalls per participant. The GDQS and PHDI were scored from the two 24-hour recall means of intake. Spearman’s correlation coefficient between the GDQS and PHDI was estimated for the whole sample and across sex, age, and income strata. Results: The correlation coefficient between the GDQS and PHDI was 0.21 (p<0.001), varying from 0.17 to 0.29 by strata. Women, elderly individuals, and the highest income strata had the strongest correlation between metrics (0.23, 0.26, and 0.29, respectively). Classification of food components into healthy, unhealthy in excessive amounts or unhealthy was discordant between metrics for vegetable oils, fish and seafood, low fat dairy, eggs, poultry and substitutes, red meat, and deep orange tubers. Conclusion: The GDQS is positively correlated with the PHDI in Brazil. Sources of discordances between metrics notably rely on the definitions of optimum intake of animal products, which should be subject to further evaluation. Acknowledgements: To the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for funding our work (grant 2013/07607-8; 2022/08172-4), and Prof. Walter Willett (Harvard University) for the contribution.
dc.identifier.citationPopulation Medicine Vol.5 (2023) , 100-101
dc.identifier.doi10.18332/POPMED/163711
dc.identifier.eissn26541459
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188146686
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/97768
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.titlesustainable dietary guidelines in Brazil
dc.typeConference Paper
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188146686&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage101
oaire.citation.startPage100
oaire.citation.titlePopulation Medicine
oaire.citation.volume5
oairecerif.author.affiliationFHI 360
oairecerif.author.affiliationHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de Campinas
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo

Files

Collections