The utility of the lineage specific immunohistochemical stains SATB2, CDX2, and villin, and the mucin glycoproteins MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 to distinguish pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma from metastatic colorectal carcinoma
Issued Date
2024-09-01
Resource Type
ISSN
00468177
eISSN
15328392
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85199145658
Journal Title
Human Pathology
Volume
151
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Human Pathology Vol.151 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Rerkpichaisuth V., Lau R.P., Meyerson C., Fishbein G.A. The utility of the lineage specific immunohistochemical stains SATB2, CDX2, and villin, and the mucin glycoproteins MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 to distinguish pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma from metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Human Pathology Vol.151 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2024.105627 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/100044
Title
The utility of the lineage specific immunohistochemical stains SATB2, CDX2, and villin, and the mucin glycoproteins MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 to distinguish pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma from metastatic colorectal carcinoma
Author(s)
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Context: The lungs are a common site of tumor metastasis. While morphology and immunophenotype can help differentiate primary from metastatic tumors, distinguishing pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (PIMA) from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) may occasionally be challenging due to overlapping morphological and immunohistochemical features. Lineage-specific markers such as CDX2, TTF-1, and napsin A are helpful with pulmonary non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (PNMA), however they are non-specific and insensitive when applied to PIMA. SATB2 is a newer marker that distinguishes CRC from upper gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary tumors; its utility in distinguishing CRC from PIMA has not been fully elucidated. Objective: To evaluate the performance of lineage-specific and mucin glycoprotein immunostains in distinguishing PIMA and CRC. Design: We stained tissue microarrays comprising 34 PNMA, 31 PIMA, and 32 CRC with CK7, CK20, SATB2, CDX2, villin, TTF-1, napsin A, and gel-forming mucins MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6. Results: PIMA showed significant (>50% of cells) expression of SATB2 (6%), CDX2 (6%), villin (74%), TTF-1 (13%), and napsin A (23%). However, significant CK7 expression was seen in nearly all PIMA (30/31) and none of the metastatic CRC. Conclusion: Our results suggest that CK7 remains one of the most useful markers for distinguishing primary PIMA from metastatic CRC. Expression of the mucin glycoproteins MUC5AC and MUC6 and lack of expression of MUC2 favored a diagnosis of PIMA, but expression of these markers was too heterogeneous to be of clinical utility. To our knowledge this is the only study comparing the immunohistochemical profile of PIMA and metastatic CRC in lung metastasectomy specimens.