Post-Truth, Testimony and Crises of Trust in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments
9
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
00111619
eISSN
19399138
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105000181093
Journal Title
Critique - Studies in Contemporary Fiction
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Critique - Studies in Contemporary Fiction (2025)
Suggested Citation
Stacy I. Post-Truth, Testimony and Crises of Trust in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments. Critique - Studies in Contemporary Fiction (2025). doi:10.1080/00111619.2025.2477103 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/108523
Title
Post-Truth, Testimony and Crises of Trust in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Margaret Atwood’s two Gilead novels, The Handmaid’s Tale (1985 [1998]) and The Testaments (2019) mimic testimony. This formal feature of the novels, combined with their dystopian setting, enables them to explore a crisis of trust with regard to narrative accounts. This article argues that, while both novels suggest that there is no way of definitively establishing any particular narrative as being credible, Shoshana Felman’s notion of the alignment of testimony is a means of achieving a qualified degree of trust in texts. In the case of The Handmaid’s Tale, this alignment remains fragile, whereas the use of multiple narrators in The Testaments enables a firmer alignment of values and experiences, and hence represents a stronger claim to the ability of texts to establish their credibility.