Analysis of neutron monitor count rates and timing distributions from latitude surveys

dc.contributor.authorYakum P.
dc.contributor.authorKhamphakdee S.
dc.contributor.authorNuntiyakul W.
dc.contributor.authorSáiz A.
dc.contributor.authorRuffolo D.
dc.contributor.authorEvenson P.
dc.contributor.authorBangliang C.
dc.contributor.authorSeripienlert A.
dc.contributor.authorJiang P.
dc.contributor.authorChuanraksasat P.
dc.contributor.authorMunakata K.
dc.contributor.authorMadsen J.
dc.contributor.authorSoonthornthum B.
dc.contributor.authorKomonjinda S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceYakum P.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-08T18:08:32Z
dc.date.available2024-02-08T18:08:32Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractNeutron monitors continuously record the hadronic part of secondary atmospheric radiation on the ground, which originates from primary cosmic rays. In Thailand, we developed a mobile neutron monitor housed inside a standard-size shipping container named “Changvan.” It contains three neutron-sensitive proportional counters set up in the typical NM64 layout. However, the central counter doesn't have the lead producer, leading us to refer to it as a “semi-leaded” neutron monitor. We examined cosmic ray spectral variations on two latitude surveys during 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. This work examines the ratio of count rates between leaded and unleaded setups, which shows notable variation based on geomagnetic cutoff rigidity, suggesting a sensitivity to the cosmic ray spectrum. This measurement could be implemented at stationary stations. The unleaded counter, shielded by the reflector with a higher count from nearby lead, may have advantages over a bare one. Furthermore, we explore alternative techniques to identify spectral changes in Galactic cosmic rays using Changvan data. We analyze using time delay histograms to determine the leader fraction (L) of neutrons that are not preceded by another neutron from the same primary cosmic ray. We also examine other parameters, including the alpha (α) parameter and pulse rate (PR), which can be compared with count rates (CR). Our findings indicate that the ratios of L and α are not significantly affected by geomagnetic cutoff rigidity. In contrast, CR and PR exhibit significant dependency and show opposite trends.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Physics: Conference Series Vol.2653 No.1 (2023)
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1742-6596/2653/1/012019
dc.identifier.eissn17426596
dc.identifier.issn17426588
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181987481
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/95584
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomy
dc.titleAnalysis of neutron monitor count rates and timing distributions from latitude surveys
dc.typeConference Paper
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85181987481&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Physics: Conference Series
oaire.citation.volume2653
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand
oairecerif.author.affiliationPolar Research Institute of China
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
oairecerif.author.affiliationShinshu University
oairecerif.author.affiliationRajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi (RMUTT)
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Delaware
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationChiang Mai University

Files

Collections