Systematic scoping review of ageing in place strategies in Japan, Singapore and Thailand: A comparative analysis
1
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14406381
eISSN
17416612
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85205720464
Journal Title
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Australasian Journal on Ageing (2024)
Suggested Citation
Satchanawakul N., Liangruenrom N., Thang L.L., Satchanawakul N. Systematic scoping review of ageing in place strategies in Japan, Singapore and Thailand: A comparative analysis. Australasian Journal on Ageing (2024). doi:10.1111/ajag.13378 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/101601
Title
Systematic scoping review of ageing in place strategies in Japan, Singapore and Thailand: A comparative analysis
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objective: Given the differing cultural contexts and service needs of older persons in the west and the east, programs or policies should be thoughtfully redesigned to accommodate these diverse societies. This paper presents a systematic scoping review of ageing in place (AIP) strategies in Japan, Singapore and Thailand, emphasising how they are tailored to address the unique challenges of ageing populations in Asia. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted through seven databases. Empirical, peer-reviewed studies in English that discussed AIP-related programs or policies involving aged populations in the target countries were included. Themes were identified using the policy triangle framework, allowing for a comprehensive comparison of AIP across the countries. Results: Three key components of AIP, place, support network and workforce, were identified from 44 included studies. Each country exhibits distinctive approaches to implementing these components. Japan has extensive AIP systems with comprehensive services and strong community and family support. Singapore offers innovative aged care with significant government involvement, though on a smaller scale. Thailand's localised initiatives focus on community health care and age-friendly city assessments, with a less developed AIP infrastructure. Conclusions: The study proposes a comprehensive framework for developing ageing policies in Asia, emphasising the need for a person-centred approach in developing AIP strategies that cater to the diverse needs of ageing populations, and underscores the importance of integrating health-care services, community support and home environment modifications. The three AIP elements advocate for a person-centred approach, providing valuable insights for policymakers to effectively manage challenges of rapidly ageing populations.