Modified pin and plate fixation for low intercondylar fractures of the humerus: biomechanical study corroborated with a case series

dc.contributor.authorJitprapaikulsarn S.
dc.contributor.authorChantarapanich N.
dc.contributor.authorGromprasit A.
dc.contributor.authorMahaisavariya C.
dc.contributor.authorPatamamongkonchai C.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T17:29:56Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T17:29:56Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Establishing fracture union of low and comminuted intercondylar fractures of the humerus is inherently challenging. The purposes of the present study were to investigate the biomechanical effectiveness of pin & plate (PP) fixation compared to other dual-plating techniques by finite element analysis, and to present a technical description as well as retrospectively review the outcomes of PP fixation in such difficult fractures. Methods: Low-level intercondylar fracture 3D models of the humerus were virtually stabilized with three fixations on lateral side including PP, lateral pre-contoured locking compression plate (L-LCP), and variable angle lateral pre-contoured locking plate (VA-L-LCP) whereas medial pre-contoured locking compression plate (M-LCP) on medial side. Loading conditions under consideration were axial compression, internal rotation, posterior bending, and valgus rotation. Regarding the clinical series, eight patients with intra-articular and comminuted fractures of the distal humerus (6 intercondylar fractures, 1 fracture-subluxation, and 1 isolated lateral condylar fracture) were operated by isolated PP fixation or combinations of PP and the other standard implants. Data were collected on fracture union, perioperative complications, and objective clinical outcomes. Results: Biomechanical results revealed the most instability of the fracture occurring under posterior bending. PP fixation presented comparable fracture stability and fragment displacement compared to other dual-plating fixations, except stress on the Kirschner wire under internal rotation which was higher than other fixations. Regarding the clinical series, fracture union was achieved in all cases with an average union time of 17 weeks (range 12–20). All except one patient had good-to-excellent MEPS results with an average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score of 14.6 (range 0–45) and an average arc of elbow motion of 107.5 degrees (range 60–140). Conclusion: By the biomechanical performance, PP fixation is a reliable technique for fixation of low intercondylar fractures of the humerus. Supported by the clinical outcomes, the present technique could be an alternative for this particular fracture especially when severe comminution prevents the use of the standard dual plating technique.
dc.identifier.citationMusculoskeletal Surgery Vol.107 No.2 (2023) , 207-221
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12306-022-00743-0
dc.identifier.eissn20355114
dc.identifier.issn20355106
dc.identifier.pmid35362865
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127438198
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85127
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleModified pin and plate fixation for low intercondylar fractures of the humerus: biomechanical study corroborated with a case series
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127438198&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage221
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage207
oaire.citation.titleMusculoskeletal Surgery
oaire.citation.volume107
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationKasetsart University
oairecerif.author.affiliationBuddhachinaraj Hospital

Files

Collections