Management of forgotten double J stents: Insight from a systematic review of case reports

dc.contributor.authorPutra A.G.P.
dc.contributor.authorAzmi Y.A.
dc.contributor.authorWirjopranoto S.
dc.contributor.authorRahmatika N.
dc.contributor.authorDe Niro A.J.N.
dc.contributor.authorWibawa A.S.
dc.contributor.authorSoetanto K.M.
dc.contributor.correspondencePutra A.G.P.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-15T18:06:11Z
dc.date.available2025-04-15T18:06:11Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Double J Stent is one of the procedures frequently performed in the field of urology. Forgotten DJ Stent is a problem that can cause serious complications. This systematic review aims to explore complications and management of patients with forgotten double J stents. Methods: Scientific literature was obtained from PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar with a publication year limited to 2013-2023. The search string included ‘forgotten DJ stent, case report, complication’. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) case report or series, (2) available individual patient data, and (3) English language. Data are presented descriptively. Results: Of the 210 records, 14 articles published were analyzed after the full-text assessment. Forgotten DJ stent sufferers vary from age 7 years to 88 years. Male gender was predominant. The initial symptoms were flank pain and micturition disorders. The complications experienced were encrustation, multiple stones formation, emphysematous pyelonephritis, emphysematous perinephric abscess, fragmentation, and vesical calculus. In management, it was found that procedures were selected according to patient's situation at that time and the condition of the stent. There are case reports that report management that differed from those initially planned. All the patients were alive after treatment. Conclusions: A forgotten DJ stent can have serious consequences. The management approach requires a combination of various endourological procedures. In consideration of potential complications, urologists need to be careful in making decisions about the choice of technique used.
dc.identifier.citationArchivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Vol.97 No.1 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.4081/aiua.2025.13301
dc.identifier.eissn22824197
dc.identifier.issn11243562
dc.identifier.pmid39882909
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002161126
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109534
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleManagement of forgotten double J stents: Insight from a systematic review of case reports
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105002161126&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleArchivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia
oaire.citation.volume97
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitas Airlangga
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitair Medisch Centrum Groningen

Files

Collections