Regional Differences in Admissions and Treatment Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorKitiyakara T.
dc.contributor.authorLeerapun A.
dc.contributor.authorSutthivanan C.
dc.contributor.authorPoovorawan K.
dc.contributor.authorPan-Ngum W.
dc.contributor.authorSoonthornworasiri N.
dc.contributor.authorChaiteerakij R.
dc.contributor.authorTreeprasertsuk S.
dc.contributor.authorPhaoswasdi K.
dc.contributor.authorMairiang P.
dc.contributor.authorKositchaiwat C.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T16:49:51Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T16:49:51Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the commonest cancers in Thailand. We report the stage and survival of patients who were admitted under the public universal health fund (NHSO) covering 47 million people to determine if there were regional disparities in the treatment outcomes in the country. Method: We used the 2009-2013 Nationwide Hospital Admission Data, Thailand. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were identified by the ICD10 code C22.0. Procedures were identified by ICD9-CM codes, and deaths were confirmed from the NHSO database and the national citizen registry. Thailand is divided into 6 regions and Bangkok. Hospitals were identified according to their specific reimbursement codes. Survival time started from the day of first admission and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The statistical method used to compare regions was Chi-squared tests (Pearson, likelihood ratio, linear-by linear association and Mantel-cox). Results: There were 36,956 HCC patients admitted during the study period. The overall median survival was 36 days. 1.63% of the patients had surgery, 0.96% had radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and 5.24% had trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). 90.24% did not have any tumor-specific therapy. The proportion of patients admitted for tumor-specific therapy vs. no tumor-specific therapy was significantly different between regions in all treatment modalities (p<0.01). Each treatment modality showed a wide range of median survival values across the regions (p<0.01). The best survival was seen in Bangkok, the South and the North (for surgery, RFA and TACE) and was often more than twice as long as the regions with the lowest survival, Central, East and West. Conclusions: There was a large previously-unreported disparity in admissions and outcomes in Thailand for different treatment modalities for HCC. Bangkok and the South had the best treatment outcomes and often had median survivals more than twice as long as those in the West and East. Public policy to reduce this disparity will need to be implemented in the future.
dc.identifier.citationAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention Vol.23 No.11 (2022) , 3701-3715
dc.identifier.doi10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3701
dc.identifier.eissn2476762X
dc.identifier.issn15137368
dc.identifier.pmid36444583
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85142904080
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/83873
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
dc.titleRegional Differences in Admissions and Treatment Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients in Thailand
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85142904080&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage3715
oaire.citation.issue11
oaire.citation.startPage3701
oaire.citation.titleAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
oaire.citation.volume23
oairecerif.author.affiliationRamathibodi Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationKhon Kaen University
oairecerif.author.affiliationVichaiyut Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
oairecerif.author.affiliationChiang Mai University
oairecerif.author.affiliationBhumiphol Adulyadej Hospital

Files

Collections