The preferable shoulder position can isolate supraspinatus activity superior to the classic empty can test: an electromyographic study
Issued Date
2023-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
14712474
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85151700816
Pubmed ID
37013546
Journal Title
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume
24
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Vol.24 No.1 (2023)
Suggested Citation
Kijkunasathian C., Niyomkha S., Woratanarat P., Vijittrakarnrung C. The preferable shoulder position can isolate supraspinatus activity superior to the classic empty can test: an electromyographic study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Vol.24 No.1 (2023). doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06372-3 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/82913
Title
The preferable shoulder position can isolate supraspinatus activity superior to the classic empty can test: an electromyographic study
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Supraspinatus (SSP) strength tests are an important shoulder examination tool for clinical evaluations of patients with a suspected SSP tear. While the empty can (EC) test is widely used to diagnose SSP dysfunction, the test cannot selectively activate SSP activity. The aim of this study was to access the electromyographic (EMG) activity within SSP, deltoid, and surrounding periscapular muscles after resisted abduction force to determine which shoulder position helps best isolate SSP from deltoid activity. Methods: A controlled laboratory EMG study was conducted. Specifically, we conducted an EMG analysis of the seven periscapular muscles (i.e., the middle deltoid, anterior deltoid, SSP, upper trapezius, posterior deltoid, infraspinatus, and pectoralis major) in 21 healthy participants, without any history of shoulder disorder, aged 29 ± 0.9 years old with a dominant-right arm. EMG activities were measured during resisted abduction force according to comprehensive shoulder positions in abduction, horizontal flexion, and humeral rotation. The supraspinatus to middle deltoid (S:D) ratio was calculated using the standardized weighted EMG and the maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the SSP and middle deltoid muscles, for each shoulder position to determine the best isolated SSP muscle strength test position. Results were analyzed with the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-normally distributed data. Results: Shoulder abduction, horizontal flexion, and humeral rotation significantly affected the activity of the middle deltoid, SSP, and S:D ratio (P < 0.05). The S:D ratio increased significantly in lower degrees of shoulder abduction, lower degrees of horizontal flexion, and external humeral rotation over internal rotation. The greatest S:D ratio (3.4 (0.5–9.1)) occurred at the shoulder position of 30° shoulder abduction combined with 30° horizontal flexion and external humeral rotation. Conversely, the classic EC position manifested nearly the smallest S:D ratio (0.8 (0.2–1.2)). Conclusion: Application of the SSP strength test in the shoulder position of 30 degrees abduction, 30 degrees horizontal flexion, and external humeral rotation offers the best position to isolate the abducting activity of the SSP from that of the deltoid, which could help with diagnosis among patients with chronic shoulder pain with a suspected SSP tear condition.