Quantifying Plasmodium vivax radical cure efficacy: a modelling study integrating clinical trial data and transmission dynamics

dc.contributor.authorCiavarella C.
dc.contributor.authorDrakeley C.
dc.contributor.authorPrice R.N.
dc.contributor.authorMueller I.
dc.contributor.authorWhite M.
dc.contributor.correspondenceCiavarella C.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-17T18:21:17Z
dc.date.available2025-02-17T18:21:17Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Plasmodium vivax forms dormant liver stages (hypnozoites) that can reactivate weeks to months after primary infection. Radical cure requires a combination of antimalarial drugs to kill both the blood-stage and liver-stage parasites. Hypnozoiticidal efficacy of the liver-stage drugs primaquine and tafenoquine cannot be estimated directly because hypnozoites are undetectable. We aimed to estimate hypnozoiticidal efficacy from clinical trial data, and quantify the community-level impact of implementing case management with radical cure. Methods: We calibrated a novel P vivax Recurrence Model to publicly available data from prospective clinical trials to estimate the hypnozoiticidal efficacy of different supervised primaquine (3·5 mg/kg or 7 mg/kg over 7 or 14 days) and tafenoquine (5 mg/kg or 7·5 mg/kg single dose) regimens in patients with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity. We used an existing P vivax Individual-Based Model to quantify the 5-year impact of case management with unsupervised primaquine or tafenoquine regimens across various transmission settings. Findings: We estimated median hypnozoiticidal efficacies of 99·1% (95% credible interval 96·0–100) for primaquine 7 mg/kg over 14 days; 96·3% (90·8–99·7) for primaquine 7 mg/kg over 7 days; 72·3% (68·1–76·3) for primaquine 3·5 mg/kg over 7 or 14 days; 62·4% (49·1–76·3) for tafenoquine 5 mg/kg single dose; and 87·5% (62·1–99·3) for tafenoquine 7·5 mg/kg single dose. 5 years of community-level tafenoquine case management was estimated to reduce P vivax transmission by 74–79% where pre-intervention prevalence as measured by PCR was low (<2%) and by 17–20% where prevalence as measured by PCR was high (around 35%). Similar 5-year reductions were estimated with primaquine case management only when adherence to the primaquine regimen was above 50%. Interpretation: Substantial reductions in prevalence as measured by PCR were predicted with primaquine and tafenoquine regimens if these could be implemented with high coverage and adherence. The benefits of preventing P vivax relapses need to be balanced against the risks of inducing severe haemolysis in patients with G6PD deficiency. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Horizon Europe.
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Infectious Diseases (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00689-3
dc.identifier.eissn14744457
dc.identifier.issn14733099
dc.identifier.pmid39818221
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85217249225
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/105332
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleQuantifying Plasmodium vivax radical cure efficacy: a modelling study integrating clinical trial data and transmission dynamics
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85217249225&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleThe Lancet Infectious Diseases
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversité Paris Cité
oairecerif.author.affiliationLondon School of Hygiene &amp; Tropical Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
oairecerif.author.affiliationMenzies School of Health Research
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine

Files

Collections