Validation of the Thai version of the quality of recovery scale (QoR-14-Thai) after elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia

dc.contributor.authorSaeaeh L.
dc.contributor.authorSitthivethayanont P.
dc.contributor.authorChalacheewa T.
dc.contributor.authorThampongsa T.
dc.contributor.authorSukying C.
dc.contributor.authorKomonhirun R.
dc.contributor.authorSangkum L.
dc.contributor.correspondenceSaeaeh L.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-30T18:04:53Z
dc.date.available2025-04-30T18:04:53Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: The 15-item Quality of Recovery scale (QoR-15), a short form of the QoR-40, is a widely used self-reported tool for measuring the postoperative quality of recovery. It has been translated into many languages. In this study, we aimed to validate a translated Thai version of the QoR-15 in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: This was a single-center observational cohort study. The QoR-15 was translated into Thai and culturally adapted, which led to the items on severe and moderate pain being merged, yielding a 14-item scale: the QoR-14-Thai. Next, the QoR-14-Thai, a checklist measuring the patients’ activities of daily living (ADL), and a 100-mm visual analog scale for assessing their global health (VAS-GH) were administered to the study patients before and 24 h after their abdominal surgery. The validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of the QoR-14-Thai were assessed. Results: Among 166 patients, 140 completed the questionnaires, achieving a questionnaire completion rate of 100%. We observed moderate convergent validity between the postoperative QoR-14-Thai and the VAS-GH (r = 0.54, p < 0.001) and ADL checklist (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). The QoR-14-Thai was negatively correlated with the length of hospital stay (r = − 0.23, p < 0.006) and postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (r = − 0.85, p = 0.001). The QoR-14-Thai had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.869), split-half reliability (0.913), test–retest reliability (0.94), and high responsiveness (Cohen’s effect size: 1.01, standardized response mean: 0.73). The median time to complete the questionnaire was 2 min (interquartile range: 1–2). Conclusions: The QoR-14-Thai was deemed a valid, reliable, and convenient tool for evaluating the quality of recovery after elective abdominal surgery. Trial registration: This study was registered prospectively on the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, identifier TCTR20210326009, on March 26, 2021.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Anesthesiology Vol.25 No.1 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12871-025-03044-8
dc.identifier.eissn14712253
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105003156570
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109840
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleValidation of the Thai version of the quality of recovery scale (QoR-14-Thai) after elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105003156570&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleBMC Anesthesiology
oaire.citation.volume25
oairecerif.author.affiliationRamathibodi Hospital

Files

Collections