Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Treatment-Naïve Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC: Five-Year Update From the Phase 3 ALESIA Study
dc.contributor.author | Zhou C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lu Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kim S.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Reungwetwattana T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | He J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yang J.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee S.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Chang J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fang J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Liu Z. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bu L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Qian L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Xu T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Archer V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hilton M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang L. | |
dc.contributor.correspondence | Zhou C. | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-01T18:13:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-01T18:13:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-09-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Previous results from the phase 3 ALESIA study (NCT02838420) revealed that alectinib (a central nervous system [CNS]-active, ALK inhibitor) had clinical benefits in treatment-naïve Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, consistent with the global ALEX study. We present updated data after more than or equal to 5 years of follow-up from the “last patient in” date. Methods: Adult patients with treatment-naïve, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC from mainland China, South Korea, and Thailand were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-daily 600 mg alectinib (n = 125) or 250 mg crizotinib (n = 62). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary or exploratory endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, time to CNS progression, and safety. Results: At the data cutoff (May 16, 2022), the median survival follow-up was 61 and 51 months in the alectinib and crizotinib arms, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 41.6 months with alectinib versus 11.1 months with crizotinib (stratified hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.23–0.49). Overall survival data remain immature; 5-year overall survival rates were 66.4% (alectinib arm) versus 56.1% (crizotinib arm). Objective response rate was 91.2% versus 77.4% with alectinib and crizotinib, respectively. CNS progression was delayed with alectinib versus crizotinib (cause-specific hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.08–0.32). Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib versus crizotinib (42.3 versus 12.6 mo). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: With four additional years of follow-up, these updated results confirm the clinical benefit and manageable safety of alectinib in Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, and confirm alectinib as a standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. | |
dc.identifier.citation | JTO Clinical and Research Reports Vol.5 No.9 (2024) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100700 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 26663643 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85202200401 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/100707 | |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
dc.subject | Medicine | |
dc.title | Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Treatment-Naïve Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC: Five-Year Update From the Phase 3 ALESIA Study | |
dc.type | Article | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85202200401&origin=inward | |
oaire.citation.issue | 9 | |
oaire.citation.title | JTO Clinical and Research Reports | |
oaire.citation.volume | 5 | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Tongji University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Zhejiang Cancer Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital of Sichuan University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital of Southern Medical University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Asan Medical Center | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Zhejiang University School of Medicine | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Guangzhou Medical University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Beijing Cancer Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Roche Products Limited UK | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Jilin Cancer Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Roche (China) Holding Ltd |