Candidemia Following Severe COVID-19 in Hospitalised and Critical Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

dc.contributor.authorSrisurapanont K.
dc.contributor.authorLerttiendamrong B.
dc.contributor.authorMeejun T.
dc.contributor.authorThanakitcharu J.
dc.contributor.authorManothummetha K.
dc.contributor.authorThongkam A.
dc.contributor.authorChuleerarux N.
dc.contributor.authorSanguankeo A.
dc.contributor.authorLi L.
dc.contributor.authorLeksuwankun S.
dc.contributor.authorLangsiri N.
dc.contributor.authorTorvorapanit P.
dc.contributor.authorWorasilchai N.
dc.contributor.authorPlongla R.
dc.contributor.authorMoonla C.
dc.contributor.authorNematollahi S.
dc.contributor.authorKates O.
dc.contributor.authorPermpalung N.
dc.contributor.correspondenceSrisurapanont K.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-18T18:14:48Z
dc.date.available2024-10-18T18:14:48Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-01
dc.description.abstractRATIONALE: The epidemiology and clinical impact of COVID-19-associated candidemia (CAC) remained uncertain, leaving gaps in understanding its prevalence, risk factors and outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase and Scopus for reports of CAC prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes up to June 18, 2024. The generalised linear mixed model was employed to determine the prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk factors and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without CAC using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: From 81 studies encompassing 29 countries and involving 351,268 patients, the global prevalence of CAC was 4.33% (95% Cl, 3.16%-5.90%) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In ICUs, the pooled prevalence of CAC in high-income countries was significantly higher than that of lower-middle-income countries (5.99% [95% Cl, 4.24%-8.40%] vs. 2.23% [95% Cl, 1.06%-4.61%], p = 0.02). Resistant Candida species, including C. auris, C. glabrata (Nakaseomyces glabratus) and C. krusei (Pichia kudriavzveii), constituted 2% of ICU cases. The mortality rate for CAC was 68.40% (95% Cl, 61.86%-74.28%) among ICU patients. Several risk factors were associated with CAC, including antibiotic use, central venous catheter placement, dialysis, mechanical ventilation, tocilizumab, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and total parenteral nutrition. Notably, the pooled odds ratio of tocilizumab was 2.59 (95% CI, 1.44-4.65). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CAC is substantial in the ICU setting, particularly in high-income countries. Several risk factors associated with CAC were identified, including several that are modifiable, offering the opportunity to mitigate the risk of CAC.
dc.identifier.citationMycoses Vol.67 No.10 (2024) , e13798
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/myc.13798
dc.identifier.eissn14390507
dc.identifier.pmid39379339
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85206034325
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101652
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleCandidemia Following Severe COVID-19 in Hospitalised and Critical Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85206034325&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue10
oaire.citation.titleMycoses
oaire.citation.volume67
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
oairecerif.author.affiliationChulalongkorn University
oairecerif.author.affiliationKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine – Tucson
oairecerif.author.affiliationJackson Memorial Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
oairecerif.author.affiliationJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationSrinakharinwirot University

Files

Collections