International Consensus on Anti-Aging Dermocosmetics and Skin Care for Clinical Practice Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
15459616
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85182267732
Pubmed ID
38206152
Journal Title
Journal of Drugs in Dermatology
Volume
23
Issue
1
Start Page
1337
End Page
1343
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Drugs in Dermatology Vol.23 No.1 (2024) , 1337-1343
Suggested Citation
Draelos Z.D., Wei L., Sachdev M., Bravo B.S.F., Vachiramon V., Jourdan M., Kerscher M., Delva C., Leclerc-Mercier S. International Consensus on Anti-Aging Dermocosmetics and Skin Care for Clinical Practice Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology Vol.23 No.1 (2024) , 1337-1343. 1343. doi:10.36849/JDD.7798 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/97335
Title
International Consensus on Anti-Aging Dermocosmetics and Skin Care for Clinical Practice Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
Author's Affiliation
Beijing Air Force General Hospital
Universität Hamburg
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Manipal Hospital
Clinica Bravo and Bravo Research Center
MS Clinical Research Pvt. Ltd
Laboratoires Vichy
Inferential
Centre Laser International de la Peau
Dermatology Consulting Services
Universität Hamburg
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Manipal Hospital
Clinica Bravo and Bravo Research Center
MS Clinical Research Pvt. Ltd
Laboratoires Vichy
Inferential
Centre Laser International de la Peau
Dermatology Consulting Services
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: The objective was to provide international recommendations on anti-aging dermocosmetics for clinical practice starting with essential ingredients for protection and repair before working up to advanced products for specific concerns. Methods: Seven international experts reviewed 8 hypothetical case scenarios covering different ages, skin issues (eg, sensitivity, acne, melasma), method was and used exposure to obtain to exposome consensus. factors Seventeen for both key sexes ingredients Do Not and all Copy were Fitzpatrick rated on skin a scale types from (FST). 1 The (totally RAND/UCLA inappropriate) appropriateness to 9 (totally appropriate). Statistical analysis, 2 meetings, and email discussions Penaltiesrefined Applythe recommendations. Results: High-factor broad-spectrum sunscreen (ie, protects against ultraviolet [UV] A and B rays), niacinamide, and other topical antioxidants were recommended for all scenarios. Further discussions were required for other ingredients. Tinted sunscreen/iron oxide were recommended for all FST, although compliance may be sub-optimal for darker skin phototypes (IV-VI), if not cosmetically acceptable. Combining a facial foundation with broad-spectrum sunscreen was recommended for darker phototypes to obtain visible light protection closely matching diverse color tones. Retinols were not recommended as a first-line treatment for sensitive skin, especially FST V and VI, due to the risk of irritation. After ablative laser treatment, alpha hydroxy acids should be avoided or used with caution in FST IV to VI due to the risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Conclusion: We describe a simple, practical tool for use in daily dermatology consultations for providing recommendations on antiaging dermocosmetics to cover diverse and inclusive populations of patients, addressing all skin types and international needs.