Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review
Issued Date
2022-11-24
Resource Type
eISSN
2296858X
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85143401467
Journal Title
Frontiers in Medicine
Volume
9
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Frontiers in Medicine Vol.9 (2022)
Suggested Citation
Tejapira K., Yongpisarn T., Sakpuwadol N., Suchonwanit P. Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review. Frontiers in Medicine Vol.9 (2022). doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.1058431 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/85369
Title
Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Immune-mediated alopecias (IMAs), a group of hair disorders associated with immunological reactions, remain a therapeutic challenge since available treatments are generally unfavorable with potential side effects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been recently proposed as a treatment option based on several limited-quality studies; however, there is no systematic evaluation of PRP efficacy on IMAs in the literature. Objective: To assess PRP’s effects in treating IMAs using a systematic review. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. A search strategy was designed to retrieve all studies exploring PRP in treating IMAs, including alopecia areata (AA) and primary cicatricial alopecias (PCAs). In addition, all randomized and non-randomized studies reporting subjective and/or objective outcomes of alopecia treatment with PRP were included. Results: Thirty-two studies were included, comprising 621 patients with AA and 19 patients with PCAs. PRP had superior efficacy as monotherapy in five studies, comparable to intralesional corticosteroids in six studies in AA treatment. In addition, in the analysis of PCAs, including lymphocytic and neutrophilic subtypes, PRP was efficacious in alleviating disease progression in nine studies. Conclusion: PRP is considered a promising treatment for AA and PCAs in patients who experienced unfavorable outcomes from conventional treatment. However, its clinical application remains to be standardized, and its recommendation as a treatment for IMAs could not be ascertained due to a lack of high-quality evidence. Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=353859], identifier [CRD42022353859].