Development and Evaluation of the DMIND Questionnaire: Preparing for AI Integration into an Effective Depression Screening Tool

dc.contributor.authorHemrungrojn S.
dc.contributor.authorSaengsai K.
dc.contributor.authorJakkrawankul P.
dc.contributor.authorKiattiporn-Opas C.
dc.contributor.authorChaichareenon K.
dc.contributor.authorAmrapala A.
dc.contributor.authorLapanan K.
dc.contributor.authorHengpraprom S.
dc.contributor.authorHiransuthikul N.
dc.contributor.authorAchakulvisut T.
dc.contributor.authorNupairoj N.
dc.contributor.authorPhutrakool P.
dc.contributor.authorYodlorchai R.
dc.contributor.authorVateekul P.
dc.contributor.correspondenceHemrungrojn S.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-22T18:10:15Z
dc.date.available2024-09-22T18:10:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: Thailand’s mental health crisis is exacerbated by high demand and a shortage of mental health professionals. The research objective was to develop and validate the Detection and Monitoring Intelligence Network for Depression (DMIND) questionnaire, designed to be culturally relevant and easily administered in clinical settings. Crafted with expert input, items specifically conducive to artificial intelligence (AI) analysis were selected to facilitate the future development of an AI-assisted depression scoring model. This approach underscores the tool’s dual utility in both human-led and technology-enhanced diagnostics. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 81 participants from psychiatric and tertiary care hospitals in Bangkok. Participants were assessed using the DMIND questionnaire, followed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Statistical analyses included the content validity index (CVI), Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Cohen’s kappa, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Liu method, Youden index, and nearest neighbor method were used to determine the optimal cut-off point Results: The DMIND questionnaire showed strong validity, with an item-level CVI (I-CVI) and scale-level CVI (S-CVI) exceeding 1.0, indicating strong consensus on its relevance and utility. The tool also demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96). ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.88, indicating high accuracy in depression screening. An optimal cut-off score of 11.5 was identified, balancing predictive value and sensitivity. Conclusion: The DMIND questionnaire represents a significant advancement in innovative mental health diagnostics, addressing unmet clinical needs by providing accurate and efficient assessments capable of AI integration for further enhancing mental health service delivery in Thailand.
dc.identifier.citationSiriraj Medical Journal Vol.76 No.9 (2024) , 620-629
dc.identifier.doi10.33192/smj.v76i9.269527
dc.identifier.eissn22288082
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85204118145
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101310
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleDevelopment and Evaluation of the DMIND Questionnaire: Preparing for AI Integration into an Effective Depression Screening Tool
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85204118145&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage629
oaire.citation.issue9
oaire.citation.startPage620
oaire.citation.titleSiriraj Medical Journal
oaire.citation.volume76
oairecerif.author.affiliationUNSW Sydney
oairecerif.author.affiliationChulalongkorn University
oairecerif.author.affiliationNeuroscience Research Australia
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

Files

Collections